IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)

Paul Wouters <paul@xelerance.com> Sun, 24 October 2010 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA553A68B7; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 14:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.406
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.406 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.193, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CZ2wSU0dYVA9; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 14:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E73C3A68B2; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 14:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1PA7md-000KJt-3w for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:07:15 +0000
Received: from newtla.xelerance.com ([193.110.157.143]) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <paul@xelerance.com>) id 1PA7ma-000KJV-9A for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:07:12 +0000
Received: from tla.xelerance.com (tla.xelerance.com [193.110.157.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by newtla.xelerance.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C88C2F9; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 17:07:09 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 17:07:09 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@xelerance.com>
To: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>
cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)
In-Reply-To: <59023.1287939121@nsa.vix.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.1010241704360.6683@newtla.xelerance.com>
References: <59023.1287939121@nsa.vix.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

On Sun, 24 Oct 2010, Paul Vixie wrote:

> Subject: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)

> so this would be opt-out rather than opt-in

But would we really have a choice in the end? What about conflicting
"favours"?  What about services being withheld if I don't "opt-in"
to a certain service (say one that blocks ads based on DNS)

I have a feeling it is too late for a DMNF bit.....

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email