Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)
Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk> Sun, 24 October 2010 23:04 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4323A677E; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 16:04:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id md2WitHN5ZRJ; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 16:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5385D3A6452; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 16:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1PA9Z6-0001Un-8N for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 23:01:24 +0000
Received: from mx4.nominet.org.uk ([213.248.199.24]) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <roy@nominet.org.uk>) id 1PA9Z3-0001U4-0A for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 23:01:21 +0000
DomainKey-Signature: s=main.dk.nominet.selector; d=nominet.org.uk; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:From:To:Subject: Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Content-Type:Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=Pg6ljOhbxq86ZXRV6PA1uTfoq6wfj0XGM+9Sq6nrTQxSmnWW23uJTAWR rYJUsw+Fpbr9xhlx+922+p42lczE9BfxNy6WTQPpxciovsqsJFdihXiGs ie9mZYJT+wwWq3J;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nominet.org.uk; i=roy@nominet.org.uk; q=dns/txt; s=main.dkim.nominet.selector; t=1287961280; x=1319497280; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Roy=20Arends=20<roy@nominet.org.uk>|Subject:=20R e:=20[dnsext]=20need=20new=20flag=20bit=20in=20EDNS,=20"d o=20me=20no=20favours"=20(DMNF)|Date:=20Sun,=2024=20Oct =202010=2023:01:14=20+0000|Message-ID:=20<C8EA875A.83BA%r oy@nominet.org.uk>|To:=20Paul=20Vixie=20<vixie@isc.org>, =20"namedroppers@ops.ietf.org"=0D=0A=09<namedroppers@ops. ietf.org>|MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding: =20quoted-printable|Content-ID:=20<42632626-62ea-484c-8a1 0-bd81dcef031e>|In-Reply-To:=20<59023.1287939121@nsa.vix. com>; bh=tciiRKBk8fcX3uLVtETDad2qT4sRuNgdEnrDbpH9RL0=; b=6C26px8BGIqagmDZ/LE+uw5hNw1C/9czl19j0td4o8TFjJxL/rEwv02J jWNUX4/c5QPeQqcfFlCeauptwowRMWDa+8KDkxxqxT+r74wrasY3D+i2q JWm0eQt6EhtKGLP;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,233,1286146800"; d="scan'208";a="22295053"
Received: from wds-exc2.okna.nominet.org.uk ([213.248.197.145]) by mx4.nominet.org.uk with ESMTP; 25 Oct 2010 00:01:18 +0100
Received: from WDS-EXC1.okna.nominet.org.uk ([fe80::1593:1394:a91f:8f5f]) by wds-exc2.okna.nominet.org.uk ([fe80::7577:eaca:5241:25d4%19]) with mapi; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:01:17 +0100
From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
To: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>, "namedroppers@ops.ietf.org" <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)
Thread-Topic: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)
Thread-Index: AQHLc55dTSnDy88VIESkTX8lBR8dOJNQyD0A
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 23:01:14 +0000
Message-ID: <C8EA875A.83BA%roy@nominet.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <59023.1287939121@nsa.vix.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <42632626-62ea-484c-8a10-bd81dcef031e>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
On 10/24/10 6:52 PM, "Paul Vixie" <vixie@isc.org> wrote: > i'm thinking we need a flag bit in edns to allow a client to opt out of > things like "web error redirection" (dns ad insertion). the semantics > of it would just be, if server policy allows "clear path" dns for this > query, then the server is requested to provide same. > > if server policy does not allow, for example if dns ad insertion isn't > optional or if the non-clear-path dns is for security reasons (blocking > malware C&C names), then "clear path" dns would not be provided. > > so this would be opt-out rather than opt-in, to make it noncontroversial. > (those of us who previously wanted opt-in have learned that opt-in is > considered controversial by the companies already doing dns ad insertion > or similar non-clear-path dns.) > > opin? i can write a short i-d on it before beijing. The end-game will be applications doing their own resolving. Real control. No third party dependencies. No favors to ask. Roy
- [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no fav… Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Colm MacCárthaigh
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Paul Wouters
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Roy Arends
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Roy Arends
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Brian Dickson
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Mans Nilsson
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Paul Vixie
- [dnsext] stub validation Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] stub validation Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Brian Dickson
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] stub validation David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] stub validation Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dnsext] stub validation Masataka Ohta
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Jim Reid
- [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… David Conrad
- [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Paul Wouters
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Colm MacCárthaigh
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Brian Dickson
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Alex Bligh
- [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Alex Bligh
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Roosenraad, Chris
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Paul Wouters
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Paul Wouters
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Jeffrey A. Williams
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… David Conrad
- [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… David Conrad
- Re: [dnsext] need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no… David Ulevitch
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Florian Weimer
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Paul Vixie
- Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do m… Jeffrey A. Williams