IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)

Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org> Tue, 26 October 2010 03:42 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CD43A68A2; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.479
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.479 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.120, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2C6g1YcP5pqg; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A833A657C; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1PAaNk-000JTo-0V for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 03:39:28 +0000
Received: from [2001:4f8:3:bb:230:48ff:fe5a:2f38] (helo=nsa.vix.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <vixie@vix.com>) id 1PAaNh-000JTU-AZ for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 03:39:25 +0000
Received: from nsa.vix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nsa.vix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4992EA1074 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 03:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vixie@nsa.vix.com)
From: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>
to: IETF DNSEXT WG <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon\, 25 Oct 2010 19\:46\:35 MST." <AANLkTimwXkUrYHveahqTMZe=V8zu8LG1MJ3HtQEZAoDW@mail.gmail.com>
References: <59023.1287939121@nsa.vix.com> <20101025094523.GA5187@nic.fr> <41281.1288025835@nsa.vix.com> <20101025233215.4A495606495@drugs.dv.isc.org> <72674.1288058394@nsa.vix.com> <AANLkTimwXkUrYHveahqTMZe=V8zu8LG1MJ3HtQEZAoDW@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.1; nil; GNU Emacs 23.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 03:39:23 +0000
Message-ID: <78766.1288064363@nsa.vix.com>
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:46:35 -0700
> From: Colm MacCárthaigh <colm@allcosts.net>
> 
> Why doesn't that belong better in HTTP? The HTTP WG is probably better
> placed to define whatever a "web error" is.

if you get an nxdomain you won't be connecting to any web server anywhere.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email