IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 26 October 2010 07:18 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43713A688D; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.171
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.171 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6+zFBbBG+dHL; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FE13A67F1; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1PAdm7-000C2I-7r for namedroppers-data0@psg.com; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:16:51 +0000
Received: from mx2.nic.fr ([2001:660:3003:2::4:11]) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>) id 1PAdm2-000Bzg-Hx for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:16:47 +0000
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id DCBFE1C008F; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:16:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E1A1C006A; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:16:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC28B568057; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:16:45 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:16:45 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: [dnsext] Re: need new flag bit in EDNS, "do me no favours" (DMNF)
Message-ID: <20101026071645.GB5959@nic.fr>
References: <59023.1287939121@nsa.vix.com> <20101025094523.GA5187@nic.fr> <41281.1288025835@nsa.vix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <41281.1288025835@nsa.vix.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux squeeze/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: To unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
List-Unsubscribe: the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
List-Archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 04:57:15PM +0000,
 Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org> wrote 
 a message of 28 lines which said:

> the internet economy recognizes first-mover advantage more often
> than not, and the ISP's and ASP's who do "web error redirection"
> today are not going to stop no matter what anybody says.

If you believe that ISPs and ASPs are bad guys that will do DNS lies
whatever the IETF says, then, what makes you think they will honor the
DMNF bit? (Specially since it is a new option so they will have to
actually act, develop stuff, etc, to honor it.)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email