IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-vixie-dns-rpz-04.txt

ac <ac@main.me> Mon, 19 December 2016 10:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ac@main.me>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35CF1294F0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:27:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.791
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.791 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=main.me
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id peKJY5Z8pqkI for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:27:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web.hostacc.com (hostacc.com [188.40.114.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21AB31294BC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:27:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=main.me; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Message-ID:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=I/pqxlF03u8Gitgzp1+Buv62UScUB+/OsC5oYM0ESMg=; b=RyOjm7OuepqaFT5gWqgJa9hgnB 5NqtTJkU5bQuNUiDc4Z2QyGLkB0KsUjnwZZzwYCNwUS8vZflHFws628eSby09htG0AylnGBGGY63C xWJf1oqpgOA+PTFwrmCYIGULCBvcK8YbyCUOb/rush5BS16CiVptl7ocHqyhHa8Csk1zxkpsNWfHB /xEVm1WlxbdvOS9i5yV89VnrEnu+BbG0+7oFXOE4paLJp2pRB8L+/N8cYaCEyuDbrZ1JGRx3j3J7x RMv4rq2Ve7B+gZ68ezYTmNe4xK3GQHEHWPjezYlml496JeP6OtR/T8uyZbjGhaNkut4GzXnhBA6SL UdwzVRGQ==;
Received: from [165.255.65.6] (port=47154 helo=tree.nuts.me) by web.hostacc.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <ac@main.me>) id 1cIvAh-00028E-OU; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:27:56 +0100
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:27:22 +0200
From: ac <ac@main.me>
To: bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>
In-Reply-To: <20161219095931.GB25654@server.ds9a.nl>
References: <20161219.101111.41661466.sthaug@nethelp.no> <20161219092509.0DBA5129452@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161219093846.GA25654@server.ds9a.nl> <20161219095038.55A171295A9@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161219095931.GB25654@server.ds9a.nl>
Organization: acmain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - web.hostacc.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - main.me
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: web.hostacc.com: authenticated_id: ac@main.me
X-Authenticated-Sender: web.hostacc.com: ac@main.me
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Message-Id: <20161219102758.21AB31294BC@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/51yBTfPMN-RXmehI3-s535Nq00Q>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-vixie-dns-rpz-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:27:59 -0000

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:59:31 +0100
bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:50:02AM +0200, ac wrote:
<snip>
> Maybe the internet was a mistake then. But I don't think we'll
> convince you.
> Huge segments of the internet do think this is a good idea. And like
> other standards, this could be used for bad purposes. But that
> doesn't mean we shouldn't do it. 
> So I'm afraid we won't make you happy if your bar is 'any standard
> that could be used for bad things shouldn't happen'.

I do not think that "huge segments of the Internet" thinks it is a good
idea to lie and to deceive.

To be clear and to boil it down: This draft publishes a method to supply
different answers to different users and to hide the truth of those lies to 
the same users.

Unless a registry, court or resource owner authorizes this, it is
lying, cheating, "fraudy" and definately deceptive. (like a cockroach
when exposed to light)

I think that if people knew what we were talking about and
truly understood the issues, there would be an uprising.

If "huge segments of the Internet" thinks it is okay to lie, cheat,
deceive and steal I guess I will still say that I do not agree.

Andre

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email