Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-vixie-dns-rpz-04.txt

Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Wed, 21 December 2016 03:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA066129C2F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:10:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1jA5zIOLkR7o for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:10:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp109.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp109.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 546AA129C21 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:10:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp14.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp14.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 87D94C0292; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 22:10:30 -0500 (EST)
X-Auth-ID: ogud@ogud.com
Received: by smtp14.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: ogud-AT-ogud.com) with ESMTPSA id 41973C028A; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 22:10:21 -0500 (EST)
X-Sender-Id: ogud@ogud.com
Received: from [10.20.30.43] (pool-71-191-33-181.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.191.33.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:587 (trex/5.7.12); Tue, 20 Dec 2016 22:10:30 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
In-Reply-To: <EBCD2226-35F7-4B18-B849-D2311F1160F8@virtualized.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 22:10:20 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AA90B2D2-4B7C-4693-ADF3-2004CC09641A@ogud.com>
References: <20161221000237.24158.qmail@ary.lan> <EBCD2226-35F7-4B18-B849-D2311F1160F8@virtualized.org>
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/IgX88CX7DzWFyTJIGuDLNWbR1CQ>
Cc: each@isc.org, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-vixie-dns-rpz-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 03:10:37 -0000

+1 
I agree this is ugly as ugly can be but that ship has sailed. 
For interoperability sake lets just publish this with a note that says something like this;

This is documentation of fielded useful protocol.
This is ugly protocol and it copying it is strongly discouraged. 


    Olafur 
> On Dec 20, 2016, at 8:24 PM, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> Regards,
> -drc
> (speaking only for myself)
> 
>> On Dec 20, 2016, at 4:02 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> "Not wanting to be recruited into a botnet" is another such consideration.
>>> Paul and Vernon invented a useful tool to help address it, and I'm
>>> in favor of documenting it.
>> 
>> I would really prefer that the IETF not embarrass itself with a rerun
>> of the NAT fiasco, in which TCP/IP purists yelled and screamed and
>> insisted that NAT was evil, while in the real world it solved (still
>> solves) real problems, and everyone implemented it in various not very
>> transparent or compatible ways.
>> 
>> RPZ is ugly but it solves serious real world problems, and it's going
>> to be used all over the world regardless of what we do.  Just this
>> week I heard from a friend at a largish company that one of their
>> suppliers got hacked with the trendy new malware that hides in web
>> page images.  Without RPZ, approximately all of their Windows users
>> would have been infected, with RPZ none of them were.
>> 
>> If we want to offer advice and perhaps technical twiddles on how to
>> deploy RPZ to minimize surprises and make it easy to find and fix
>> mistakes, that would be swell.  Insisting that it's stupid and wrong
>> confirms the not ill-founded impression that dnsop is out of touch
>> with the real world.
>> 
>> So, yes, we should adopt this draft.
>> 
>> R's,
>> John
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop