IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-vixie-dns-rpz-04.txt

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Tue, 20 December 2016 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90081296CC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:46:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MH-BJlPW7zeF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:46:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE3211296A7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:46:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21E8E242125E; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:46:28 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <20161220064134.49C40129C74@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:46:27 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C2DC80D4-E999-4D62-A2B8-E6146D1E2796@rfc1035.com>
References: <20161219.101111.41661466.sthaug@nethelp.no> <20161219092509.0DBA5129452@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161219093846.GA25654@server.ds9a.nl> <20161219095038.55A171295A9@ietfa.amsl.com> <32D6D9A0-17F2-4C86-A06B-55DF4D747159@rfc1035.com> <20161219115524.A9D31129795@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161220044238.C0307129473@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161220045606.GA63084@isc.org> <20161220053120.299FD349452@mx.pao1.isc.org> <20161220061242.GC63084@isc.org> <20161220064134.49C40129C74@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: ac <ac@main.me>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/XismJPXFhHyNDAGnk2OmtWEo29Q>
Cc: IETF dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-vixie-dns-rpz-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:46:31 -0000

> On 20 Dec 2016, at 06:40, ac <ac@main.me> wrote:
> 
> my reply and opposition to the publication of the draft is that it is not ethical.

In that case, I suggest the WG notes your objection and otherwise ignores it. You don’t have a veto anyway: nobody does.

The rest of us should now be able to get on with the job of assessing the technical and operational merit of the ideas in this draft. If you have a meaningful, relevant and constructive contribution to make to that discussion, go ahead. If you don’t, you can either be quiet or take those rants elsewhere. Thank you.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status