Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-vixie-dns-rpz-04.txt

"Allan Liska" <allan@allan.org> Tue, 20 December 2016 06:23 UTC

Return-Path: <allan@allan.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30B91297E4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 22:23:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hpNB470Do3ow for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 22:23:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (smtp10.hushmail.com [65.39.178.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D16AB1297C5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 22:23:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 34B4BC023C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 06:23:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-hush-tls-connected: 1
Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 06:23:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id DC480E0372; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 06:23:10 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 01:23:10 -0500
To: ac <ac@main.me>, Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
From: Allan Liska <allan@allan.org>
In-Reply-To: <20161220053119.E681E1297BE@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20161219.101111.41661466.sthaug@nethelp.no> <20161219092509.0DBA5129452@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161219093846.GA25654@server.ds9a.nl> <20161219095038.55A171295A9@ietfa.amsl.com> <32D6D9A0-17F2-4C86-A06B-55DF4D747159@rfc1035.com> <20161219115524.A9D31129795@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161220044238.C0307129473@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161220045606.GA63084@isc.org> <20161220053119.E681E1297BE@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_4f60458f2d779efd5f6d0887a01430d4"
Message-Id: <20161220062310.DC480E0372@smtp.hushmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/WbthljQbUzFnlOLIEYImOdJ7hw8>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-vixie-dns-rpz-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 06:23:13 -0000

On 12/20/2016 at 12:31 AM, "ac"  wrote:
> If you wish to consider a physical analog, there may be a general
> principle that one should not interfere with postal mail, but this
is
> challeged by the existence of the unabomber or the anthrax attacks.
> 
In your example, you still require a court order, you do not have
standing to make a decision to intervene yourself.

in DNS, it is much more subtle, it is about honesty, morality and
ethics.

Andre

Your nonsense is starting to get annoying.  The whole reason that RPZ
exists is because there are a whole bunch of dishonest, unethical and
immoral people out there registering bad domains and attacking my
users. Tools like RPZ help me defend organizations against these
people, and frankly I don't care if I violate the rights of the
jackhole who registered bank0fammmerica.com to attempt to defraud my
users.  
RPZ is a necessary tool, and it makes a lot of security sense, and I
would much rather have a standardized and well document version of it
so everyone understands it. Go talk to the bad guys about honesty,
morality and ethics and let us know how that goes.  
allan