IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-vixie-dns-rpz-04.txt

ac <ac@main.me> Tue, 20 December 2016 04:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ac@main.me>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1AD71294F9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:42:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.791
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.791 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=main.me
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fWReA0Nfwmbr for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:42:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web.hostacc.com (hostacc.com [188.40.114.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0307129473 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:42:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=main.me; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Message-ID:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=YM31b85HrDHdbdyOpglFW9KnfLCNwVvLuVkps+7s1Zw=; b=aL2yPuzhZPbpziwR9kA5Rge0qz BQ0Q2s2Vw36H0eaqr5OCmrSc93Kfi94QV9TFlLSv0nD+BCLksdszNQ6UB9RqzEXUAMYVwkOPh9PD5 xgkoo4X7QDFsZ9j+Z8lGlQ4eFY/UkR/u7vW1aEIAHSsxokuX6vuiKkYBXBt3w1eQIW+nr8ybHKIO3 zVclGBKLKHYWkTwtjq1i+1k8Vd5RxZd7b5kxcaeYKx4alEy7Qpjy6VW7TL0LJ5CquWEyc6L7tJo+t qooL2fZ2rVQCmuMZawrdaJVf1VU9/7PkUwk8N/FyUaDqsWfajNAasi+9JbI1AvxAmUuQ0jd0m6npG A3Irrtng==;
Received: from [165.255.92.104] (port=33032 helo=tree.nuts.me) by web.hostacc.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <ac@main.me>) id 1cJCG4-0003zk-Bn for dnsop@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 05:42:36 +0100
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 06:42:02 +0200
From: ac <ac@main.me>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20161219115524.A9D31129795@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20161219.101111.41661466.sthaug@nethelp.no> <20161219092509.0DBA5129452@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161219093846.GA25654@server.ds9a.nl> <20161219095038.55A171295A9@ietfa.amsl.com> <32D6D9A0-17F2-4C86-A06B-55DF4D747159@rfc1035.com> <20161219115524.A9D31129795@ietfa.amsl.com>
Organization: acmain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - web.hostacc.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - main.me
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: web.hostacc.com: authenticated_id: ac@main.me
X-Authenticated-Sender: web.hostacc.com: ac@main.me
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Message-Id: <20161220044238.C0307129473@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/al0woY0TAYqH3bnyLx0F7E8A9dU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-vixie-dns-rpz-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:42:39 -0000

In advance, I do apologize for me taking additional bandwidth

I received many interesting off list emails, many did not understand 
why ethics regarding IP was different from that of names. I incorrectly
assumed that everyone simply knew that there are differences.

This may also be a basic consideration why some DNS admins do not see
what they do as so much different than that which other admins do,

Maybe this needs to be said in more detail, instead of what I am
saying just looking like a belief or a point of view. 

> On Dec 19, 2016, at 2:28 AM, ac <ac@main.me> wrote:  
> > In your example, ethically, it is a problem that should be
> > addressed on IP, not on DNS  
> 

the reason why there is an ethical difference between Domain Names and
IP resources starts with the fact that domain names are other people's
actual intellectual (legal) property. There is also all the other
considerations, for example DNS is a question whereas some other
protocols are instructive, based on the answers to questions.

IP resources (RIR) are generally not registered as intellectual property
and so the ethical considerations regarding IP are different to that of names.

There is more, and the rest could be added so that the ethical side of DNS may 
become more highlighted.

Andre

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email