IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-vixie-dns-rpz-04.txt

ac <ac@main.me> Tue, 20 December 2016 06:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ac@main.me>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5121294E3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 22:46:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.791
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.791 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=main.me
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZMGBerbPC3ov for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 22:46:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web.hostacc.com (hostacc.com [188.40.114.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A78651294CD for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 22:46:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=main.me; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Message-ID:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=QSN2rjLPjn5go05qAQWFQ7eFNnzvBLZ4KC7GkAosW/o=; b=VqNOzV2QNAi44k2nKIVtlE+5X4 4SXxYss3UmVju2Mc9k9CJAVwdmYlKpw5BaCjBujq/Ypzgg4AkjjWPdx7pEIiSW8ieJ9kvOFAACTBj wO2HcpCU8dI7DNoCumzLnJKSr7zzQXV0wWW88szZqRUPLlEajak5VdddHUoeaN0e2nZdFKy8YN2RK 8A98sPtOsoi6eWUadFCKLR1RpHa/HictTXKsfs6uR9ahBe3owrUsLVZXoUsncU7QWIJha1TNdvfxF 1Uj47VumirT7v6kwnb54flC8EfK+p9Vb9Zdjr6eZ3Cv7+gkTAXMMjCNkV+rP35o/MCj1b9dbWfXlN cc0vxtDA==;
Received: from [165.255.92.104] (port=35722 helo=tree.nuts.me) by web.hostacc.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <ac@main.me>) id 1cJEBp-0007Tf-Ij; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:46:22 +0100
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:45:46 +0200
From: ac <ac@main.me>
To: Allan Liska <allan@allan.org>
In-Reply-To: <20161220062310.DC480E0372@smtp.hushmail.com>
References: <20161219.101111.41661466.sthaug@nethelp.no> <20161219092509.0DBA5129452@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161219093846.GA25654@server.ds9a.nl> <20161219095038.55A171295A9@ietfa.amsl.com> <32D6D9A0-17F2-4C86-A06B-55DF4D747159@rfc1035.com> <20161219115524.A9D31129795@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161220044238.C0307129473@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161220045606.GA63084@isc.org> <20161220053119.E681E1297BE@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161220062310.DC480E0372@smtp.hushmail.com>
Organization: acmain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - web.hostacc.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - main.me
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: web.hostacc.com: authenticated_id: ac@main.me
X-Authenticated-Sender: web.hostacc.com: ac@main.me
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Message-Id: <20161220064623.A78651294CD@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/I6feKQIcB0NVI6acSFl0ubFLWk0>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-vixie-dns-rpz-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 06:46:24 -0000

On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 01:23:10 -0500
"Allan Liska" <allan@allan.org> wrote:
> On 12/20/2016 at 12:31 AM, "ac"  wrote:
> > If you wish to consider a physical analog, there may be a general
> > principle that one should not interfere with postal mail, but this
> is challeged by the existence of the unabomber or the anthrax attacks.
> In your example, you still require a court order, you do not have
> standing to make a decision to intervene yourself.
> in DNS, it is much more subtle, it is about honesty, morality and
> ethics.
+++
> Your nonsense is starting to get annoying.  The whole reason that RPZ
> exists is because there are a whole bunch of dishonest, unethical and
> immoral people out there registering bad domains and attacking my
> users. Tools like RPZ help me defend organizations against these
<snip>

It is not really an argument to say just because someone else has no

ethics it is also okay for me not to have ethics.

This is now becoming off topic and not related to this draft.

Andre

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email