IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: NSEC vs NSEC3.

Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> Tue, 23 February 2010 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <each@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF753A7622 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:01:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pvFRT2RXJ5Cg for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:01:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CEC428C35D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:01:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by farside.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id 68188E60B9; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:03:11 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:03:11 +0000
From: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@xelerance.com>
Message-ID: <20100223190311.GD55822@isc.org>
References: <200904282021.n3SKL3sg051528@givry.fdupont.fr> <59A58419-FDBD-4810-B2FA-0D293FFA00A5@NLnetLabs.nl> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1001211245180.12114@newtla.xelerance.com> <1AEAE091-2EB3-41DC-A51B-8DD49C10FAD5@NLnetLabs.nl> <24C8A8E2A81760E31D4CDE4A@Ximines.local> <8E6C64ED-A336-4E8B-996F-9FB471EB07C6@NLnetLabs.nl> <823a0s4dvz.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1002231021210.9909@newtla.xelerance.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.1002231021210.9909@newtla.xelerance.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: NSEC vs NSEC3.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:01:26 -0000

> >hashes.  However, NSEC records are sometimes returned in response to
> >DO=0 queries,
> 
> Wouldn't that be an implementation bug?

Not if it was an ANY query.  Otherwise, yes.

-- 
Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email