IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: NSEC vs NSEC3.

Paul Wouters <paul@xelerance.com> Tue, 23 February 2010 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@xelerance.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3D63A8490 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:20:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.513
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Tm71k6VaUDN for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:20:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from newtla.xelerance.com (newtla.xelerance.com [193.110.157.143]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69D43A847F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:20:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tla.xelerance.com (tla.xelerance.com [193.110.157.130]) by newtla.xelerance.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4595BBFE7; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:22:09 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:22:09 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@xelerance.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
In-Reply-To: <823a0s4dvz.fsf@mid.bfk.de>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.1002231021210.9909@newtla.xelerance.com>
References: <200904282021.n3SKL3sg051528@givry.fdupont.fr> <59A58419-FDBD-4810-B2FA-0D293FFA00A5@NLnetLabs.nl> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1001211245180.12114@newtla.xelerance.com> <1AEAE091-2EB3-41DC-A51B-8DD49C10FAD5@NLnetLabs.nl> <24C8A8E2A81760E31D4CDE4A@Ximines.local> <8E6C64ED-A336-4E8B-996F-9FB471EB07C6@NLnetLabs.nl> <823a0s4dvz.fsf@mid.bfk.de>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: NSEC vs NSEC3.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:20:09 -0000

On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:

> hashes.  However, NSEC records are sometimes returned in response to
> DO=0 queries,

Wouldn't that be an implementation bug?

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email