Re: [Ecrit] IETF ECRIT Design Team on Premature Call Termination

Marc Linsner <mlinsner@cisco.com> Tue, 07 October 2008 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ecrit-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ecrit-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ecrit-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D5F3A6AA0; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F85F3A686C for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qPDlvs31fl2j for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2643A6AB0 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,375,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="23526445"
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2008 21:28:07 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m97LS7l9007567; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:28:07 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m97LS7Fx022138; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:28:07 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:28:07 -0400
Received: from [10.116.195.115] ([10.116.195.115]) by xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:28:06 -0400
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.12.0.080729
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:28:04 -0400
From: Marc Linsner <mlinsner@cisco.com>
To: Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>
Message-ID: <C5114CA4.CD1A%mlinsner@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Ecrit] IETF ECRIT Design Team on Premature Call Termination
Thread-Index: AckooC/i8oVjuBu8S0uFXP7ygv670wABB+lAAAfRXW4=
In-Reply-To: <04e701c928a4$d9277880$8b766980$@net>
Mime-version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Oct 2008 21:28:06.0701 (UTC) FILETIME=[96976DD0:01C928C3]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1399; t=1223414887; x=1224278887; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mlinsner@cisco.com; z=From:=20Marc=20Linsner=20<mlinsner@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[Ecrit]=20IETF=20ECRIT=20Design=20Team= 20on=20Premature=20Call=20=20=20Termination |Sender:=20 |To:=20Brian=20Rosen=20<br@brianrosen.net>; bh=OPMamItgsrySV9Z7Pmn1ottvGVH5Vvxs45luy5eePxw=; b=FDFrCLhr7ch4erQtvgzMbZEZG539MFKI54LyKDUVmtsh1GFMBniRSqXQmX bea0CtEE/IY5VA1jsAktnC90qgrySjxXYsyF47kxUpw7cRCKCA+8YpoINiok 404tzZR6SG;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=mlinsner@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
Cc: 'ECRIT' <ecrit@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] IETF ECRIT Design Team on Premature Call Termination
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org

Brian,

On 10/7/08 1:48 PM, "Brian Rosen" <br@brianrosen.net> wrote:

> It is in use in some jurisdictions now.  Canada is an example.  It was
> deployed in the U.S., it got lost, and they mostly want it back.  It is not
> deployed in some areas.  The requirements state that if it's not needed, it
> doesn't stop termination, which implies some feature signaling with the
> appropriate defaults.

Remember, in the jurisdictions where this is currently deployed, it works
for only 35% of 9-1-1 calls (as 65% are from cellular).

> 
> In jurisdictions that have it deployed, I am not aware of the kind of
> problems you were imagining.  The current implementations put the call taker
> in charge of signaling alerts.
> 
> Brian
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Hardie [mailto:hardie@qualcomm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 1:15 PM
> To: Brian Rosen; 'James M. Polk'; 'Henning Schulzrinne'; 'Hannes Tschofenig'
> Cc: 'ECRIT'
> Subject: Re: [Ecrit] IETF ECRIT Design Team on Premature Call Termination
> 
> At 7:15 AM -0700 10/7/08, Brian Rosen wrote:
>> It's manual, not automatic.
>> 
>> When the PSAP call taker decides the call is over, then call termination
>> occurs.  They release the call (with a button).  In the proposed
> mechanisms,
>> the caller cannot terminate until then.

What document contains the proposed mechanisms?

-Marc-


_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit