Re: [Ecrit] IETF ECRIT Design Team on Premature Call Termination

"DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Mon, 06 October 2008 22:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ecrit-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ecrit-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ecrit-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1183A6B24; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 15:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093F73A6B24 for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 15:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.513
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XXtelVf8IBTK for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 15:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6FC63A6804 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 15:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ilexp03.ndc.lucent.com (h135-3-39-50.lucent.com [135.3.39.50]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id m96MjTQt017431; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:45:29 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from DEEXP02.DE.lucent.com ([135.248.187.66]) by ilexp03.ndc.lucent.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:45:29 -0500
Received: from DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com ([135.248.187.20]) by DEEXP02.DE.lucent.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 7 Oct 2008 00:45:26 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:45:25 +0200
Message-ID: <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE29180023B0173@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <A3DFA850-D495-4045-9CA0-3A0F4888A4D5@cs.columbia.edu>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Ecrit] IETF ECRIT Design Team on Premature Call Termination
Thread-Index: Ackn4UrEly4wcLPaRhO29+Va7KSyDQAIV5Sg
References: <48EA3476.6000806@gmx.net> <A3DFA850-D495-4045-9CA0-3A0F4888A4D5@cs.columbia.edu>
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Oct 2008 22:45:26.0187 (UTC) FILETIME=[39870FB0:01C92805]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
Cc: ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] IETF ECRIT Design Team on Premature Call Termination
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org

I believe the previous agreement was that we would get the requirements
drafted, and then decide whether there was consensus to implement those
requirements.

I do not see in Hannes mail any incorporation of this into the process.

Regards

Keith 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org] 
> On Behalf Of Henning Schulzrinne
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 7:27 PM
> To: Hannes Tschofenig
> Cc: 'ECRIT'
> Subject: Re: [Ecrit] IETF ECRIT Design Team on Premature Call 
> Termination
> 
> I agree with Ted's concerns. In particular, "premature call 
> termination" has never been defined precisely and many of the 
> fears are based on the old single-line physical phone model 
> which just don't apply here. Carrying forward notions that 
> apply to black phones with rotary dials just seems unhelpful. 
> In particular, the topic is strongly connected to call-back 
> and should not be treated in isolation.
> 
> Henning
> 
> On Oct 6, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > we had a chat with Jon on how to make some progress on the 
> subject of 
> > "Premature Call Termination" and here is the plan we came up with:
> >
> > * We delete the sentence that talks about the UAC not 
> generating a BYE 
> > request in 
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ecrit-phonebcp-05.txt
> > We progress the document through the IETF process as "planned".
> >
> > * At the same time we create a design team in ECRIT to work on 
> > "Premature Call Termination".
> >
> > Depending on the progress of the design team we are able to 
> > incorporate the results of it into the document (even at a 
> fairly late 
> > stage of the document process). If the design team does not produce 
> > results then anything that comes out of it can be seen as 
> an extension 
> > to the Phone BCP document.
> >
> > We need members for the design team! We have already received the 
> > commitment of folks from NENA but we also need some guys from the 
> > ECRIT group. Who is interested in participating?
> >
> > Ciao
> > Hannes & Marc
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ecrit mailing list
> > Ecrit@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> 
_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit