Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Sat, 06 May 2017 05:43 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602F7127B52 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 May 2017 22:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sj9Gme--GnGP for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 May 2017 22:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BB72120725 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 May 2017 22:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id D0AF8A4; Sat, 6 May 2017 07:43:39 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1494049419; bh=v5w6DjmIne2JuXx0khK3T+aZgSB0LgNmzBYgtos7lCU=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=GBRFvwkspFKB3MTlrVW4B1gDe2SzG3akf0RYJsrGpuKcxcMG1HGv9aBg1id4Wt0EC IZUAsEG1Z2TuJTHlA9Fe6xlWS6+0Sdp52bC4NwcG1YTsn+ZXm2sdEDwpcBJluFx19m JeOC4XN85gQUFXes5kwUsJ1upFpMRXwGdsN5xIGc=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD7FA3; Sat, 6 May 2017 07:43:39 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 07:43:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <d861a100123b4c76bb8672e93f8ab52b@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1705060741590.30304@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <D4E812E8-AA7B-4EA2-A0AC-034AA8922306@juniper.net> <CA+b+ERkFXEGf9YXbFksvYvgcz8hEYsTZJP38GFFoWr8DSihDKA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERmMTq4gEu7s8_sBX-WQat8Fn2MUJUyXAbvdr0K=+WdPew@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=_WCeU_HPpBm5XFjEd1autFCnzVqV33pvXrOOjtuG=Nw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERmKT5PTJb7bdCG-vGjebAmvKYjWtyqRKPQiLP37RjFSmA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERmCruh1pr_22kF8OsLn0oW8reJfoe1nKjBd6kjAC1Y_vA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERm6UFgTrfkPA_wrbt9trUejyby56vvFedrmn5FP4Sg28w@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERkmZZuU7W-n2CPtu0xfPGO=E3K9Gy9o8aOZqj5uf5duCg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERnRqisRs3sdtxTm9R7H_HpLw82qd+7kAqaTZbRFi1ZGww@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERkxwXS9u7Kt4uEA4=P6JA9M+8Ha96ny2+kOGFeDe+NYAA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERk6U1VZTdoNtve8b-HqxNBPkymF0i-++ixw5bN+yXAWcA@mail.gmail.com> <83ea4c7c-5d17-b92d-19a4-cfa572b3f070@cisco.com> <CAH1iCioOMDtR1LYVxZ5NxuCxDtChwKQ7P8g+_aOXL3C6pj609w@mail.gmail.com> <d861a100123b4c76bb8672e93f8ab52b@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Ag7u4iKXhDFD_FMx-E4XgeJGqek>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 May 2017 05:43:45 -0000

On Fri, 5 May 2017, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) wrote:

> A router cannot tell the difference between upgrade and out-of-the-box in general.
> Turn on an unconfigured router and then paste in an existing configuration.
> That is an upgrade that looks like out-of-the-box.

Pasting in an existing configuration is out-of-the-box.

Booting an existing configuration that includes operating version that 
created it, means change of defaults can be managed by version migration 
code.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se