Re: Individual submissions and Informational RFCs

wayne <wayne@schlitt.net> Sun, 11 December 2005 03:36 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ElI0H-0001TM-Ti; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 22:36:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ElI0F-0001SA-Aj for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 22:35:59 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA04343 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 22:35:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ElI0e-0003KD-2B for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 22:36:27 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1ElHyr-0007Mg-TQ for ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 04:34:33 +0100
Received: from footbone.schlitt.net ([67.52.51.37]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 04:34:33 +0100
Received: from wayne by footbone.schlitt.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 04:34:33 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: wayne <wayne@schlitt.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:34:06 -0600
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <x4wticl32p.fsf@footbone.schlitt.net>
References: <20051209221401.9125.qmail@xuxa.iecc.com> <439A086A.10705@dcrocker.net> <x464pwn8sm.fsf_-_@footbone.schlitt.net> <B0FCBC5090CCA25CF5D62A81@svartdal.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: footbone.schlitt.net
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FnQpUVHlMj1R87noYaO7KlXQ8is=
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: Individual submissions and Informational RFCs
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

In <B0FCBC5090CCA25CF5D62A81@svartdal.hjemme.alvestrand.no> Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> writes:

> --On lørdag, desember 10, 2005 11:47:37 -0600 wayne <wayne@schlitt.net> 
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Is this [non-WG I-Ds going to PS] a change/evolution in IETF
>> procedures from days-gone-by? 
>
> [...]
> There's an exposition of the various kinds of processing in RFC 3710,

Thanks.  While I have read RFC2026 quite a few times, I had not seen
RFC3710.  It does clear up some of the questions I had.


-wayne


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf