IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational

Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Sat, 10 December 2005 09:05 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1El0f7-00034M-UJ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 04:05:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1El0f4-00032w-M4 for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 04:04:59 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA01176 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 04:03:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mtagate1.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.150]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1El0fF-0006vJ-T8 for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 04:05:11 -0500
Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate1.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBA94Xec192868 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 09:04:33 GMT
Received: from d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.213]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id jBA94XjE222488 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:04:33 +0100
Received: from d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBA94XhW026620 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:04:33 +0100
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBA94WiN026617 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:04:32 +0100
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-145-255-186.de.ibm.com [9.145.255.186]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA80660 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:04:32 +0100
Message-ID: <439A9A1E.9030006@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:04:30 +0100
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20051209221401.9125.qmail@xuxa.iecc.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051209221401.9125.qmail@xuxa.iecc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aefe408d50e9c7c47615841cb314bed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

I remind people that the IESG has completed its appeal
handling for these documents. People are certainly entitled
to their opinions, of course, but the IESG appeal process
has ended.

     Brian


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email