IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 MARID <ietf-mxcomp@imc.org>

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 26 August 2005 13:15 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8e3J-0003an-8S; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:15:25 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8e3G-0003Vv-Bx; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:15:22 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA18458; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:15:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr ([192.134.4.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8e3y-000647-Ly; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:16:07 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CD626C08D; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:15:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from maya40.nic.fr (maya40.nic.fr [192.134.4.151]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D0926C076; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:15:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from batilda.nic.fr (postfix@batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by maya40.nic.fr (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id j7QDFDYa976626; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:15:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by batilda.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 42BB816A9C9; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:15:13 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:15:13 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: ietf@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, MARID <ietf-mxcomp@imc.org>
Message-ID: <20050826131513.GA29797@nic.fr>
References: <B5BB79FFA1CF09E73E64D992@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <1124993318.13993.123.camel@thunk> <09E57A88-3A53-4A78-99D9-67E95B93E9C5@hxr.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <09E57A88-3A53-4A78-99D9-67E95B93E9C5@hxr.us>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mx2.nic.fr
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Cc:
Subject: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 MARID <ietf-mxcomp@imc.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 08:47:17AM -0400,
 Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> wrote 
 a message of 21 lines which said:

> If this is the source of the conflict, then BOTH experiments should
> not use the v=spf1 records.

It is an absolutely incredible request since SPF uses these records
since its beginning (a long time before Sender-ID existed) and since
there is (unlike SenderID) actual deployment, which can not be called
back.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email