IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Fri, 09 December 2005 20:48 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ekp9y-0004EB-K7; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:48:06 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ekp9p-0004CN-Qz for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:48:04 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA28311 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 15:46:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ekp9x-0002RO-4D for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:48:05 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ekp7C-000745-5O for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:45:14 +0100
Received: from 1cust60.tnt7.hbg2.deu.da.uu.net ([149.225.100.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:45:14 +0100
Received: from nobody by 1cust60.tnt7.hbg2.deu.da.uu.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:45:14 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:44:19 +0100
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <4399ECA3.5B65@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <200512081104.09113.julian@mehnle.net> <4398AE3D.512D@xyzzy.claranet.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0512090838400.13902@netcore.fi> <4399C0C6.48EB@xyzzy.claranet.de> <x44q5inlcv.fsf@footbone.schlitt.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 1cust60.tnt7.hbg2.deu.da.uu.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (OS/2; U)
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: spf-discuss@v2.listbox.com
Subject: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

wayne wrote:

> There have been a couple of people who have run stats on the
< usage of spf2.0/pra vs SPF.  It *is* being used, but no where
> near as much as SPF.

I was referring to your article in spf-discuss some months ago,
where you found that a dummy spf2.0/pra "opt out" is apparently
not evaluated by Hotmail.  Did this change ?  Here's a link to
your 2005-07-24 article:

<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss/18037>

                          Bye, Frank



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email