IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

Julian Mehnle <julian@mehnle.net> Thu, 25 August 2005 23:54 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8RYX-0000Bo-L1; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:54:49 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8RYV-0000Bj-Ur for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:54:48 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA29329 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:54:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from io.link-m.de ([195.30.85.225] ident=daemon) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8RZ7-0007DE-Dq for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:55:26 -0400
Received: from gray.home.mehnle.net (p549A6656.dip.t-dialin.net [::ffff:84.154.102.86]) (AUTH: PLAIN julian@mehnle.net, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,RC4-MD5) by io.link-m.de with esmtp; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 01:54:25 +0200 id 0000BCEB.430E5A31.00003479
From: Julian Mehnle <julian@mehnle.net>
To: ietf@ietf.org, MARID <ietf-mxcomp@imc.org>, SPF Discussion <spf-discuss@v2.listbox.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 01:54:14 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <B5BB79FFA1CF09E73E64D992@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
In-Reply-To: <B5BB79FFA1CF09E73E64D992@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200508260154.15466.julian@mehnle.net>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc:
Subject: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> not speaking for anyone but myself.....
>
> one matter of principle:
>
> are you of the opinion that the IESG should try to police which
> experiments get run on the Internet by refusing to publish RFCs
> documenting possibly-conflicting experments?

Let me phrase it this way: the IESG should not sanction conflicting 
experiments by publishing conflicting specifications, especially not if 
those specifications were explicitly requested by the IESG as individual 
submissions after the demise of a working group that had previously 
already shown consensus on not allowing that conflict which has only 
_now_ become a reality in one of the individual submissions.

Julian.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDDlonwL7PKlBZWjsRAiYZAJ0eTdjybYoeUHDPenw2bAJ0J1+rdQCgglwP
j9QcH7h68l1nDcrGH7MvxIs=
=eEqD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email