IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Fri, 09 December 2005 23:04 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkrHa-0003zp-UZ; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:04:06 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkrHX-0003uv-ES for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:04:04 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA24548 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 18:03:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkrHi-0002JU-Tb for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:04:18 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EkrF2-0006NT-41 for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 00:01:28 +0100
Received: from 1cust60.tnt7.hbg2.deu.da.uu.net ([149.225.100.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 00:01:28 +0100
Received: from nobody by 1cust60.tnt7.hbg2.deu.da.uu.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 00:01:28 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 23:58:39 +0100
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <439A0C1F.2FEC@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <200512092141.NAA00720@gra.isi.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 1cust60.tnt7.hbg2.deu.da.uu.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (OS/2; U)
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: spf-discuss@v2.listbox.com
Subject: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Bob Braden wrote:

> I cannot find any evidence from RFC 2026 that there is any
> such thing as an "IETF experiment" or "IETF-sanctioned
> experiment".

Yes, that's tricky.  Some folks including me were surprised
that there's no "IETF last call" for experimental RFCs, unless
they are the product of an IETF WG (4.2.3).  That's one of the
reasons why the v=spf1 author and others wanted PS.  The AD of
the former MARID WG wanted to handle this as some kind of post-
MARID experiments without "IETF last call".  The IESG sticked
to this plan.

v=spf1 is not really an "experiment" anymore after two years
with about 1,000,000 published records one year ago, and it's
not really "IETF" without "last call" (not for lack of trying).

                           Bye, Frank



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email