IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Tue, 13 December 2005 18:21 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmEmd-0007o4-Om; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:21:51 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmEmb-0007nL-Qe for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:21:50 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA02340 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:20:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EmEna-0002og-4W for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:22:54 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EmEju-0006PG-0S for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:19:02 +0100
Received: from c-180-161-151.hh.dial.de.ignite.net ([62.180.161.151]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:19:01 +0100
Received: from nobody by c-180-161-151.hh.dial.de.ignite.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:19:01 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:09:16 +0100
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <439F0E4C.1493@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <200512092141.NAA00720@gra.isi.edu> <x4fyp1n5xs.fsf@footbone.schlitt.net> <tslbqznbcem.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <x48xuqksa1.fsf@footbone.schlitt.net> <1134489989.5110.47.camel@bash.adsl-64-142-13-68>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-180-161-151.hh.dial.de.ignite.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (OS/2; U)
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Douglas Otis wrote:

> The problem with SPF draft is there is no spf2.0/mfrom.

One week from draft-ietf-marid-mailfrom-00 to the termination
of MARID was a bit short.  And after that the next draft was
again v=spf1 draft-lentczner-spf-00 (same author).  Actually
an emergency draft, because the last real v=spf1 expired at
this time - expecting that MARID creates something better as
far as I was concerned.

The next real thing was draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00 putting
anything that was lost back in, minus some syntax issues found
in MARID, and addressing the processing limit issues.

Whatever you think, but your complaints about the theoretical
upper limit of DNS queries in an attack scenario resulted in
some of the most interesting post-MARID changes (Wayne's I-Ds).

Can't beat CSV of course, but in practice a no-nonsense HELO
policy is now okay, 1 or 2 queries.

                           Bye, Frank



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email