IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Fri, 26 August 2005 20:22 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8kiG-0005ko-5d; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:22:08 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8kiE-0005kh-Dt for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:22:06 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA20515 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:22:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8kiz-00068P-Fo for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:22:55 -0400
Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1E8kh4-0007aF-An for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:20:54 +0200
Received: from 62.80.58.221 ([62.80.58.221]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:20:54 +0200
Received: from nobody by 62.80.58.221 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:20:54 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 21:51:00 +0200
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <430F72A4.6FA2@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD375A2AB8@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.80.58.221
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (OS/2; U)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf-mxcomp@imc.org, spf-discuss@v2.listbox.com
Subject: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

> But I do not believe that SPF and Sender-ID conflict in any
> way whatsoever and this was accepted by the WG

What you believe is your business, but this was never accepted
by the WG, because it's plain wrong, see also reference [12]
in the appeal:

http://purl.net/xyzzy/home/test/senderid-appeal.htm#r12

The complete thread (starting in mxcomp) is very interesting:
http://news.gmane.org/group/gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss/thread=8111

                            Bye, Frank



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email