IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Fri, 26 August 2005 18:11 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8ifa-0005bT-1j; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:11:14 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8ifU-0005bG-33; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:11:10 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA04794; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:11:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org ([69.25.196.178] helo=carter-zimmerman.mit.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8igE-0007SS-5m; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:11:56 -0400
Received: by carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 1BCBBE0049; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:10:55 -0400 (EDT)
To: spf-discuss@v2.listbox.com
References: <B5BB79FFA1CF09E73E64D992@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <1124993318.13993.123.camel@thunk> <09E57A88-3A53-4A78-99D9-67E95B93E9C5@hxr.us> <x43bowpzni.fsf@footbone.schlitt.net> <7E876E12-3D43-4BFB-8F5B-76C3E985A610@hxr.us> <x4pss0oili.fsf@footbone.schlitt.net>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:10:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <x4pss0oili.fsf@footbone.schlitt.net> (wayne@schlitt.net's message of "Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:53:13 -0500")
Message-ID: <tslbr3klgb4.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Cc: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>, iesg@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, MARID <ietf-mxcomp@imc.org>
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

>>>>> "wayne" == wayne  <wayne@schlitt.net> writes:

    wayne> In <7E876E12-3D43-4BFB-8F5B-76C3E985A610@hxr.us> Andrew
    wayne> Newton <andy@hxr.us> writes:
    >> But since you brought this up: if you (the author of the
    >> document) do not consider this to be an experiment, then
    >> perhaps the IETF should not publish SPF as an Experimental RFC.

    wayne> I asked for the IESG to not consider the SPF I-D to be
    wayne> experiemental.  It was turned down.  According to Ted,
    wayne> *none* of the IESG members expressed interest in changing
    wayne> the status from Experiemental.


As a point of fact, I only saw requests from you to publish as a
proposed standard or some other standards track document rather than
experimental.

Of course I would not have seen private communication between you and
Ted.

however if you do not consider SPF an experiment, standards track is
not the only status to consider.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email