IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Fri, 26 August 2005 12:47 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8dcR-0003Jz-PM; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:47:39 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1E8dcK-0003Em-Gg; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:47:37 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA16095; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:47:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from zak.hxr.us ([216.93.167.200] helo=zak.ecotroph.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8dd1-000555-Pu; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:48:18 -0400
Received: from [10.0.1.4] ([::ffff:64.83.8.178]) (AUTH: PLAIN anewton, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,RC4-SHA) by zak.ecotroph.net with esmtp; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:47:23 -0400 id 000B3ACD.430F0F5C.0000619D
In-Reply-To: <1124993318.13993.123.camel@thunk>
References: <B5BB79FFA1CF09E73E64D992@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <1124993318.13993.123.camel@thunk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <09E57A88-3A53-4A78-99D9-67E95B93E9C5@hxr.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:47:17 -0400
To: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@sun.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>, ietf@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, MARID <ietf-mxcomp@imc.org>
Subject: Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Aug 25, 2005, at 2:08 PM, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:

> In this case, the two experiments interpret the same codepoints in the
> DNS in subtly different ways.
>
> A mail-sending domain indicates that it is participating by publishing
> certain DNS RR's.
> Crucially, a mail-sending domain cannot opt in to the SPF experiment
> without also opting in to the senderid experiment.  This renders any
> claimed results of either experiment suspect.

If this is the source of the conflict, then BOTH experiments should  
not use the v=spf1 records.

-andy

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email