IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

"Dick St.Peters" <stpeters@netheaven.com> Fri, 09 December 2005 13:59 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkimC-0003kM-F3; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 08:59:08 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ekim1-0003im-Bc for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 08:59:07 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA07091 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:57:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from saint.heaven.net ([198.69.28.164]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ekilt-0004LL-Fy for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 08:58:50 -0500
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v0.1.1 saint.heaven.net jB9DwOo4007635
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nowsp; d=netheaven.com; s=saint; t=1134136705; h=X-DomainKeys: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject: In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer; b=HAq5B7/ew1IGFE91Br+00yNSSSdsPf0O psCo14o6rIzbKx572WbdiBzpJB7bsXR9UsZtiNT20Lt7jepfiJfHrw==
X-DomainKeys: Sendmail DomainKeys Filter v0.3.0 saint.heaven.net jB9DwOo4007635
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=saint; d=netheaven.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to: references:x-mailer; b=aRGqPgsE7gBeHqntf1ismw/3O2xsv3DZZ8+vLQRxgqCGqeZGpnVhXO3jBrz9X229K X8PwuIBPOp3a1eGdP1Bog==
Received: from saint.heaven.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saint.heaven.net (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jB9DwOo4007635; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:58:25 -0500
Received: (from stpeters@localhost) by saint.heaven.net (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jB9DwOQw007632; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:58:24 -0500
Message-ID: <17305.36224.584090.853821@saint.heaven.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 08:58:24 -0500
From: "Dick St.Peters" <stpeters@netheaven.com>
To: spf-discuss@v2.listbox.com
In-Reply-To: <200512091303.37502.julian@mehnle.net>
References: <200512081104.09113.julian@mehnle.net> <4398AE3D.512D@xyzzy.claranet.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0512090838400.13902@netcore.fi> <200512091303.37502.julian@mehnle.net>
X-Mailer: VM 7.01 under Emacs 21.3.1
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Julian Mehnle writes:
> As my appeal[1] pointed out, at the time draft-lyon-senderid-core-00 was 
> submitted for experimental status, there was no "running code" that 
> actually interpreted "v=spf1" as "spf2.0/mfrom,pra".

Perhaps you shouldn't have said that.  Sendmail's sid-milter has used
v=spf1 records for PRA checks since its initial release in August
2004.  I don't know the date for draft-lyon-senderid-core-00, but I
believe it was well after August.

--
Dick St.Peters, stpeters@NetHeaven.com 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email