IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last call IETF experiments

Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Wed, 14 December 2005 22:03 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmeiT-0003DT-7d; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:03:17 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmeiP-0003Aw-Bf for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:03:15 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA03399 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:01:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Emej4-0003Bg-Px for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:03:59 -0500
Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EmegV-00080u-90 for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:01:15 +0100
Received: from 1cust183.tnt3.hbg2.deu.da.uu.net ([149.225.14.183]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:01:15 +0100
Received: from nobody by 1cust183.tnt3.hbg2.deu.da.uu.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:01:15 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 22:46:18 +0100
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <43A092AA.5E2A@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <200512092141.NAA00720@gra.isi.edu> <439A0C1F.2FEC@xyzzy.claranet.de> <tsl4q5ghlsj.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <439CAF6D.1ECE@xyzzy.claranet.de> <tslek4ftlxm.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 1cust183.tnt3.hbg2.deu.da.uu.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (OS/2; U)
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: spf-discuss@v2.listbox.com
Subject: Re: Last call IETF experiments
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Sam Hartman wrote:

> seems like a reasonable decision making tool for the IESG
> to apply in some cases.

Yes, thinking about ways to enforce a "last call" I ended up
with some evil DoS attack scenarios.  If authors insist on it
they could still try to add something where "IETF consensus"
is required.
                        Bye, Frank



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email