Re: https at ietf.org

mrex@sap.com (Martin Rex) Thu, 07 November 2013 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mrex@sap.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9195E21E8096 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:17:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.837
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.837 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.188, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ixzH+83LAz3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:17:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpde02.sap-ag.de (smtpde02.sap-ag.de [155.56.68.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AFA21E8087 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:17:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail06.wdf.sap.corp by smtpde02.sap-ag.de (26) with ESMTP id rA7KHfbh025252 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 7 Nov 2013 21:17:41 +0100 (MET)
Subject: Re: https at ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6ivbrk=NXgd4_5Upik+8H0AbHRy3kJnN=8fcK+Bz3pOV9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 21:17:41 +0100
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL125 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20131107201741.520AC1AA69@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
From: mrex@sap.com
X-SAP: out
Cc: IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mrex@sap.com
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 20:17:54 -0000

Tim Bray wrote:
> Wouldn't it be a good idea for everything at *.ietf.org to be served by
> HTTPS

Yes.

https://tools.ietf.org   has been available for a little while
https://www.ietf.org     seems to work

which hosts are left without?


>
> and only by HTTPS?

Now that would be extremely inconvenient and counterproductive to
create impediments for access to open&public information, am I am
strongly opposed to that latter.


-Martin