IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: https at ietf.org

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Thu, 07 November 2013 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3840911E8210 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:33:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9qq6OHyu2gzc for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:33:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2512611E8149 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:33:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id 7C90D18C0E2; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:33:46 -0500 (EST)
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: https at ietf.org
Message-Id: <20131107173346.7C90D18C0E2@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 12:33:46 -0500
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 17:33:53 -0000

    > From: Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org>

    > To that effect, if we're really serious about this stuff, shouldn't
    > we want all email on the lists signed as well?

?? That would provide authentication. I thought the issue on the table was
privacy?

	Noel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email