IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: https at ietf.org

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 07 November 2013 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7826E11E8117 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:43:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.289
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.290, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_41=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SnYhi3sXoqT0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:43:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og125.obsmtp.com (exprod7og125.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA0511E80D9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:43:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob125.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUnv7f/2Ed7pG/8UKrSYlGhplQ88EXngx@postini.com; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 12:43:45 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290DB1B82E8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:43:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F31E5190043; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:43:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:43:43 -0800
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Subject: Re: https at ietf.org
Thread-Topic: https at ietf.org
Thread-Index: AQHO2qIaRBarL/JKSEG/1rV78IBalZoYl5IAgAADF4CAACnmgIABADiAgAAEOwCAAA9WgIAA7JWA
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 20:43:41 +0000
Message-ID: <7681AD18-C20B-4EF5-80F8-84B33A61BCE0@nominum.com>
References: <CAHBU6ivbrk=NXgd4_5Upik+8H0AbHRy3kJnN=8fcK+Bz3pOV9Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.01.1311051733570.4200@egate.xpasc.com> <01P0FR4HDQNG00004G@mauve.mrochek.com> <CAHBU6ivZS33r4HHbCC391Ug9fMtZkJ3nojEeeqH5L+0+o3ZqGQ@mail.gmail.com> <01P0FU0CS96Q00004G@mauve.mrochek.com> <26C6A672-A5D2-44C4-B343-9CCE5E388348@standardstrack.com> <CAKHUCzzzT-0p89uT62zrxGqF1XACG+Ok7hNLcuTaDad7R7eCTQ@mail.gmail.com> <EA2A8649-F8E6-4802-BDD7-AD593D387B9D@nominum.com> <D571EF71-FEFB-49F6-890F-78791EF3FCA7@tzi.org> <D30A3FE8-8751-409B-A0D5-E5F82BB80D88@nominum.com> <FB59737F-3D0A-42EF-9609-2910AFD754BB@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <FB59737F-3D0A-42EF-9609-2910AFD754BB@tzi.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <12CC1025D649F44EB924BE50AC8321AD@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 20:43:51 -0000

On Nov 6, 2013, at 10:36 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> No, I want privacy, and all my right-thinking crew-cut friends are using http://ietf.org, so I still stand out for STASI when I’m usinghttps://ietf.org.

The mere fact that you are going to http(s?)://www.ietf.org already flags you for further monitoring, whether you use SSL or not.   But I see your point.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email