Re: https at ietf.org

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Mon, 09 December 2013 02:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B49B1AE1AE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 18:22:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id peYbubiDYeuY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 18:22:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dougbarton.us (dougbarton.us [208.79.90.218]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F2A1AE17D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 18:22:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:d:5e7:f0ca:8858:86b6:a817] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:d:5e7:f0ca:8858:86b6:a817]) by dougbarton.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C84B22B15; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 02:22:44 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dougbarton.us; s=dougbarton.us; t=1386555764; bh=z6i6ZWwsiqPAYIiGrDs7Ayav5+uoIOcAa2y+er/Pfts=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ScTW0rZulHiZmqHuD9mN48Wg6LY7RJbXvjdcPOFOhYQN+t1GlCztoAxqLSB9j+gam xCZoXL27z1byPRD1oGHfXt5jAwOsFYCFVqEfAPkV52LFzRmq/pDHYDsbsLi8GKoePJ tR+PiGcXFCYWf9ci/jcCGB9hC+r7AbMQV+csqv20=
Message-ID: <52A52972.3020601@dougbarton.us>
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 18:22:42 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: https at ietf.org
References: <20131125180608.55454.qmail@joyce.lan> <E5836934-317D-4E73-80CC-B8847047852A@virtualized.org> <CAMm+LwhXb6uYJLie1FmJE34aC0EO39_t7331X1O0iD=-gmSEvw@mail.gmail.com> <38B94CB1-C62A-4BAC-85D4-B08FB7315CE9@virtualized.org> <CAMm+LwhF5-nEdM0Rjh1XtK1X=_xo6GkqPnZgfGaCEJ19g8ULrg@mail.gmail.com> <52A176E0.1050708@dougbarton.us> <CAMm+LwiH=1446tXZLKxUyz+jpMHy573aAd5zg1_+Z4kEbVc33A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwiH=1446tXZLKxUyz+jpMHy573aAd5zg1_+Z4kEbVc33A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 02:22:50 -0000

On 12/08/2013 10:21 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> As I pointed out, what I was objecting to was yet another iteration of
> someone asserting that the DNSSEC PKI is different from the CA system in
> a way that it is not actually different.
>
> So I don't have to fix DNSSEC, all I need to fix here is to have David
> and others stop making claims for the protocol that are not supported by
> evidence.

Um, no. What you originally asserted was that the root was vulnerable to 
being hijacked by an NSL. You have yet to provide any evidence of that, 
and when confronted by evidence to the contrary you changed the subject.

So leaving aside the fine points of PKI and how they do or do not relate 
to the root, do you have _any_ evidence to support your original assertion?

Doug