IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: https at ietf.org

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Wed, 06 November 2013 02:01 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0BF21F9D98 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:01:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pFrqbpYuxaGo for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:01:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22e.google.com (mail-qa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6E421F8531 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:01:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id j7so1653819qaq.19 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:01:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=from:content-type:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to; bh=UG2qPTkGiGETHm7Og6HcrHCZ987fNnATdt36b7Dglp0=; b=XMsnR7AzTccdUNynDOxfy0OHNEfMaExBtGwrexkuZtuBbUKYpUcsvr5zaqCT1haK0i trlNJZD28r9BdXalJSyYadJt6FDWJMBrV1lv2lCyKsYeUMP+BUWYFctHQQceS0fyAYco 7Za3jiI29dN+rZcjK0FVYacFJCr4ttk5wNHHE=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-type:message-id:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to; bh=UG2qPTkGiGETHm7Og6HcrHCZ987fNnATdt36b7Dglp0=; b=INJGcwMUsM4xMStrYTp4UrI3OAAbNtI8ldMUJtQMTTcSTIax4KLSpmTHl47Wnd4p0P 5WAfSFYLeX7ajpeKPpzhWjUhzGY86mWCFNNK4acqnffWjjk5eWFD9d0f76YDo9iJUzkY RxM5bNldtsUvbB5sOcqogk5CKiDutd9fsYH4VdC+iUBpw8UrXRiAz3CargXh+48yNzLS ZHCDDrTKwO53RYTowKhyL9KvSO+3+OntIAgkmyWC+8ihbOBQI3WubPmkSYoZIdcX7Ea6 vNYM1ziKdU7wDqZ7vfmSWF9cq5CvbmgESKXeTssOcdZ2yYdYfOek16puEWXKTP5MuBPj SFmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnihesc0Jdt98mYcI34mzn/xr+wJ3fhwMG4wCnI0zlXijUB/skbc/qroB/idfnG1AfsYrvM
X-Received: by 10.49.47.84 with SMTP id b20mr941039qen.83.1383703263211; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:01:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wireless-v6.meeting.ietf.org ([2001:67c:370:160:3476:f0b2:5280:562]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a5sm74068815qae.2.2013.11.05.18.01.02 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:01:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_56BBCF91-C1ED-4289-AB5D-0489D2FCFF0E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Message-Id: <2C7C9388-E1BA-4EAB-98F9-E94886D2DB6D@hopcount.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1816\))
Subject: Re: https at ietf.org
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:00:59 -0800
References: <CAHBU6ivbrk=NXgd4_5Upik+8H0AbHRy3kJnN=8fcK+Bz3pOV9Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.01.1311051733570.4200@egate.xpasc.com>
To: IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1311051733570.4200@egate.xpasc.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1816)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:01:08 -0000

On 2013-11-05, at 17:35, David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> wrote:

> I don't see reason to use https for delivery of public documents such
> as RFCs and Internet Drafts. All that would really accomplish is
> reduce caching opportunities.

I don't mind random people in the public library seeing me choose a book, but I might object to someone following me around taking notes of every reading choice I ever made, especially if there was no way to know if it was happening.

Funny how that kind of statement sounds less paranoid every year that passes.


Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email