Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft

Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com> Sun, 02 December 2012 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F0821F8789 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:18:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f6ez+bHFa3Qg for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:18:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gg0-f172.google.com (mail-gg0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC1121F873B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:18:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-gg0-f172.google.com with SMTP id r1so329781ggn.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 12:18:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lGa9KtSYKETjWSrC5bH2+Sf4KwftoiApzrg9w1uNqZQ=; b=Tb/xazSsEnuEd15LK2bhIrTeKAktdEebLOYjyuwzGzTwnywHr2/TyG/bLgpXSojm4r vw1n3erKS6VLFBMP20UW8yu8R0BCGDPs2R/w46pLcFX4FQPgHzZ+m6ba1GymzENN72+j v2WY7DHghOiS5fjwlBPp6LfUpJy4wXkWKKnwvIzJ5+XDNG1xC4d1xvC2Vkic4HA13hoX IMIi9EsLCeOMhjN5eYtJhiPw27uKb3vWAYwVsodvUH2//rFS9E/gSnU4JCOznyN9aL4c RA+lyKsOZjpgu8HQCrD4zpjl95gKQ215cGdiYuK22wC2Pp5UCJNQJv0FfL87TpCzSnDS hfxg==
Received: by 10.236.162.69 with SMTP id x45mr8406114yhk.111.1354479519824; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 12:18:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2800:af:ba30:dce4:8d71:6412:72dd:2b46? ([2800:af:ba30:dce4:8d71:6412:72dd:2b46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s21sm11127876yhb.5.2012.12.02.12.18.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 02 Dec 2012 12:18:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50BBB79C.40106@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:18:36 -0200
From: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft
References: <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD5923033897C9BF@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <01a701cdcd81$7d365380$77a2fa80$@olddog.co.uk> <50BBA236.9010603@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <50BBA236.9010603@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 20:18:41 -0000

	In Section 2.1, I would add in specifically-inappropriate criteria:

	- Accept an I+D for the merely fact to have a more structured
discussion in the WG.

Regards
::as

On 02/12/2012 16:47, Dave Crocker wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/28/2012 8:00 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>> I led the discussion in the WG Chairs lunch at IETF 78 on this topic.
>> Slides at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/group/edu/wiki/IETF78#
> 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> There is now an Internet Draft, based on Adrian's's slides, intended to
> document common practice in the adoption of working group drafts:
> 
>> Title:   Creating an IETF Working Group Draft
>> Status:  http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-crocker-id-adoption
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    The productive output of IETF working groups is documents, as
>>    mandated by the working group's charter.  Working groups develop
>>    these documents based on initial input of varying levels of maturity.
>>    An initial working group draft might be a document already in wide
>>    use, or it might be a blank sheet, wholly created by the workiing
>>    group, or it might represent any level of maturity in between.  This
>>    document discusses the process of creating formal working group
>>    drafts that are targeted for publication.
> 
> 
> 
> Although it is not intended for a standards-track or bcp publication, it
> would be helpful to have discussion that moves the document to represent
> good agreement among the community.
> 
> d/
>