IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft

Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com> Sun, 02 December 2012 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9611421F87BC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:25:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YrbhoHCkC5YY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:25:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gg0-f172.google.com (mail-gg0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0DC21F87A4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:25:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-gg0-f172.google.com with SMTP id r1so330246ggn.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 12:25:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=npGD5UjPfgPgbeD5yGJZajb82xQdFRII2ANwuxRA8as=; b=mJkowdCSGwnTx3lJoPuw6+CoC6fmDwpWQEeJk4qKdM7xWxX5lxa6Cas75qHbAUJane jDX564mXDpTHHxrPIB36Pspw33uV4QIA/MVDeWlQUz4wm/3dVuiEcFYZkF/f0HvZNXMA nIyTQFCD29A9gbaB4Cy7a3mokUrkLVZR9M6YGJBo23U68Yll1/CLfuzagfTbAJfnShpw xDy14F5jiHT3a+NbkDjMMKD3xuAHnXKUwpaDJFNve+99vPA7FsZfkP6R71HvavvN23S2 ZpdK5Mo2GStBAj7A/XHV+prC3pO1qM/xdZ7B/46YIH60pqE992dEakDoClXmczUXMSNv ehZQ==
Received: by 10.236.142.139 with SMTP id i11mr8318087yhj.24.1354479937714; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 12:25:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.133] (r186-48-220-228.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy. [186.48.220.228]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k49sm11124961yhj.13.2012.12.02.12.25.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 02 Dec 2012 12:25:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50BBB940.1020302@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:25:36 -0200
From: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft
References: <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD5923033897C9BF@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <01a701cdcd81$7d365380$77a2fa80$@olddog.co.uk> <50BBA236.9010603@dcrocker.net> <50BBB79C.40106@gmail.com> <50BBB862.8090209@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50BBB862.8090209@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 20:25:38 -0000

	So it is ok to have bad ideas as I+D, possibly harmful for the Internet
just to have a structured discussion?

	
Regards,
as

On 02/12/2012 18:21, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On 12/2/12 11:18 AM, Arturo Servin wrote:
>>
>> 	In Section 2.1, I would add in specifically-inappropriate criteria:
>>
>> 	- Accept an I+D for the merely fact to have a more structured
>> discussion in the WG.
> 
> I'm actually not sure about that.  It seems to me that in the past
> we've had working group documents which were not intended for
> publication, and I think they'd fall under this criterion.  I may
> be misremembering.  At any rate I'm not sure I see the value in
> ruling these out.
> 
> Melinda
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email