IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 03 December 2012 00:06 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B4921F87EB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 16:06:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.544
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.544 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NPHAXEJdGIzN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 16:06:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C7921F87BC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 16:06:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1TfJYQ-0007Br-SM; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:06:35 +0000
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 09:06:33 +0900
Message-ID: <m2txs4uhh2.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft
In-Reply-To: <50BBECA7.1010700@gmail.com>
References: <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD5923033897C9BF@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <01a701cdcd81$7d365380$77a2fa80$@olddog.co.uk> <50BBA236.9010603@dcrocker.net> <50BBB79C.40106@gmail.com> <50BBB862.8090209@gmail.com> <50BBB940.1020302@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121202130842.0a8266e0@resistor.net> <50BBE5C3.7050802@gmail.com> <m2y5hgui46.wl%randy@psg.com> <50BBECA7.1010700@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: SM <sm@resistor.net>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, ietf@ietf.org, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:06:48 -0000

> What I meant is that accepting the I+D as WG document clears the path
> of the bad idea to become RFC somehow or at least to waste a lot of
> time fighting against it.

we used to call that 'discussion' as opposed to ppt presentation.  and
discussion is what wgs were for, see other thread.

randy, who is way above his intended posting limit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email