RE: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 29 November 2012 21:16 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7166221F8C47 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:16:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.587
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r3uWZy+zhFXK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:16:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87EEE21F8C40 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:16:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qATLG638032036; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:16:07 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qATLG6vw032030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:16:06 GMT
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'SM'" <sm@resistor.net>, "'IETF discussion list'" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD5923033897C9BF@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <CALaySJLT=6RTZahqB1LO_Aw=7sAMiyrXK=xacwrBgLieZhqeDw@mail.gmail.com> <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD59230338A657EC@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121129105444.0b8d3400@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20121129105444.0b8d3400@resistor.net>
Subject: RE: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:16:05 -0000
Message-ID: <02ba01cdce76$be921580$3bb64080$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJh66a/LNfCMvKWuQdcHBWtm9X2zgHx7K5AAdAQl6UCU5WZU5aoaTUg
Content-Language: en-gb
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:16:09 -0000

Just picking at one point...

> According to some RFC:
> 
>    "All relevant documents to be discussed at a session should be published
>     and available as Internet-Drafts at least two weeks before
>     a session starts."
> 
> If the above was followed there shouldn't be any draft submissions
> during the week a meeting is held.

What about drafts that not for discussion at a session? What about drafts that
have completed last call or are in IESG processing?

Cheers,
Adrian