Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Thu, 19 November 2009 12:47 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A79B3A69BA for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:47:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ErJvnyaaVRhz for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:47:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f183.google.com (mail-yw0-f183.google.com [209.85.211.183]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FBB3A691B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:47:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ywh13 with SMTP id 13so2623989ywh.29 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:47:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=l5SPQBERdgOYrz2NdS6MK+mD1+jlc+Q8XVkXBldQ0H4=; b=EIBAXp5JAbQFlGCLDcpCijr0MUsqJbomfQSG5Ja6c0q5WmB8H/yoVOiMyBHxH1cjZx ktpVBsD+O+rp6QsHFpKtcsRMo+oOxCR6atNo4PEXS1ozjYviTdGX/cMFWVLIgLZZQyA8 a3rHeywzRhNcOXjzXRX6lVEqsT9TjasuaWeD4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qqppFlPiIko8UHTRawH5y7xTvJhAAyuiy5wXCNGvHL2tDvEnFODci3VRHZ2x+y0BUC Bdr5bexo8+RS/Zlp1WguqRozpLRCLg0ZF7slZX2XPlZPEOcUK4wusq1Mdaa24IiOivlH /FA5bYyIfayuDa2kd910QIDsjg9ZmneDS7zp4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.91.26.14 with SMTP id d14mr101017agj.84.1258634826710; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:47:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4B04A9C5.6060904@gmail.com>
References: <487AB12E-FD4A-4AD5-8641-17B4B64C6F8F@cisco.com> <4B04A9C5.6060904@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:47:06 -0500
Message-ID: <a123a5d60911190447n79d90c09v37e760c11c080e8c@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:36:05 -0800
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:47:19 -0000
I don't see the issue as being whether the decision would have been different, the rules were not followed. Rescinding the decision is certainly appropriate. It would be useful to know whether any other parties have implemented this spec to date. If so the situation is rather different since the other parties would be affected in two ways, first by the withdrawal of the registration itself but secondly as it may affect defenses against a RIM infringement claim under the Dell decision. We should remember that the intention of the rules was to make them self-policing by attempting to engage legal sanctions in the case of default. If a company does not make timely disclosure of its IPR it risks having damaged it. On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > How about the IESG simply rescinds its decision in this week's > meeting? I don't see any need for an appeal; if there's a > prima facie violation of the disclosure rules, it's just a > management item. Much less bother than an appeal. > > Of course, the rescission would be subject to appeal, but > that's another story. > > Brian > > On 2009-11-19 15:02, Cullen Jennings wrote: >> >> On October 8, the IESG approved the registration of >> application/3gpp-ims+xml Media Type. On Nov 2, RIM filed an IPR >> disclosure related to this at >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1219/ >> >> The associated patent, filed Oct 2008, is at >> >> http://www.google.com/patents?id=Mk7GAAAAEBAJ >> >> and the related draft is >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bakker-sipping-3gpp-ims-xml-body-handling >> >> I will note John-Luc Bakker from RIM is an author of both the patent >> and and the draft. The draft has been widely discussed at IETF with no >> mention of IPR before this. As an IESG member, I was not aware of this >> IPR at the time the approval was made and I do not believe any other >> IESG members were aware of it. I do believe the discussion would have >> been different had the IESG been aware of this IPR. >> >> If anyone thinks this is, ah, inappropriate, I would recommend they >> appeal the IESG decision to approve this. (see section 6.5 of RFC 2026 >> for how this works). An IETF LC on this in the future would allow the >> community to make an decision that was informed of the IPR. >> >> Cullen >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ietf mailing list >> Ietf@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >> > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > -- -- New Website: http://hallambaker.com/ View Quantum of Stupid podcasts, Tuesday and Thursday each week, http://quantumofstupid.com/
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Stephan Wenger
- RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and i… Cullen Jennings
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… John C Klensin
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Scott Lawrence
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… ned+ietf
- RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Dan Wing
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… tytso
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Stephan Wenger
- RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… John-Luc Bakker
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… John Levine
- RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Russ Housley
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Thierry Moreau
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Simon Josefsson
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Dave Cridland
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Simon Josefsson
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Scott Brim
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Dave CROCKER
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Simon Josefsson
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Thierry Moreau
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Simon Josefsson
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Scott Lawrence
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Scott Brim
- RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Glen Zorn
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Tobias Gondrom
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Simon Josefsson
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (a… Simon Josefsson