Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)

Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> Tue, 01 December 2009 10:57 UTC

Return-Path: <simon@josefsson.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDCB3A6A30 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 02:57:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.503
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.503 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.096, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4MMMgWAG+o8c for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 02:57:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from yxa-v.extundo.com (yxa-v.extundo.com [83.241.177.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42F53A6992 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 02:57:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mocca.josefsson.org (c80-216-24-211.bredband.comhem.se [80.216.24.211]) (authenticated bits=0) by yxa-v.extundo.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nB1AvOhs003138 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:57:26 +0100
From: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
To: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
References: <487AB12E-FD4A-4AD5-8641-17B4B64C6F8F@cisco.com> <4B04A9C5.6060904@gmail.com> <5F5E5CDB0670267DF04D9561@PST.JCK.COM> <01NG9VCEWETC0002QL@mauve.mrochek.com> <A6741735F236784CBB00AAD60DCED23F034FE5CB@XCH02DFW.rim.net> <20091120151251.B04DCF2403F@odin.smetech.net> <87iqd1v9qq.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <4B0A8B41.30005@gmail.com> <20091123124442.46510698@gg1.cs.columbia.edu> <4B11A797.5080905@gmail.com> <871vjgujwz.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <4B143A31.2070707@gmail.com>
OpenPGP: id=B565716F; url=http://josefsson.org/key.txt
X-Hashcash: 1:22:091201:ietf@ietf.org::aiPYKWDGLBHcoNTP:06Yi
X-Hashcash: 1:22:091201:scott.brim@gmail.com::Klmsz3L9mVTfSFcO:3PwR
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:57:24 +0100
In-Reply-To: <4B143A31.2070707@gmail.com> (Scott Brim's message of "Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:33:37 -0500")
Message-ID: <87vdgrezcb.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at yxa-v
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:57:38 -0000

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> writes:

> Simon Josefsson allegedly wrote on 11/30/2009 10:11 AM:
>> There is no requirement in the IETF process for organizations to
>> disclose patents as far as I can see.  The current approach of only
>> having people participate, and disclose patents, in the IETF is easy to
>> work around by having two persons in an organization doing different
>> things: one works on specifying and standardizing technology, and the
>> other is working on patenting the technology.
>
> Simon, from rfc3979:
>
>    l. "Reasonably and personally known": means something an individual
>       knows personally or, because of the job the individual holds,
>       would reasonably be expected to know.  This wording is used to
>       indicate that an organization cannot purposely keep an individual
>       in the dark about patents or patent applications just to avoid the
>       disclosure requirement.  But this requirement should not be
>       interpreted as requiring the IETF Contributor or participant (or
>       his or her represented organization, if any) to perform a patent
>       search to find applicable IPR.

I don't see how this modifies anything?  The legal obligation is on the
IETF participant, not on the organization.  The organization is not
bound by this text.

/Simon