RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Thu, 19 November 2009 02:02 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9793D3A67D8 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:02:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_33=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DtDhGZN5lDjO for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:02:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47193A6809 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:02:11 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAKo1BEurRN+K/2dsb2JhbADATZd+hDsE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,768,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="106392353"
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.223.138]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2009 02:02:09 +0000
Received: from [192.168.4.177] (rcdn-fluffy-8711.cisco.com [10.99.9.18]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAJ229OO026899 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:02:09 GMT
Message-Id: <487AB12E-FD4A-4AD5-8641-17B4B64C6F8F@cisco.com>
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Impp: xmpp:cullenfluffyjennings@jabber.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Subject: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:02:08 -0700
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:02:12 -0000

On October 8, the IESG approved the registration of application/3gpp- 
ims+xml Media Type.  On Nov 2, RIM filed an IPR disclosure related to  
this at

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1219/

The associated patent, filed Oct 2008, is at

http://www.google.com/patents?id=Mk7GAAAAEBAJ

and the related draft is

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bakker-sipping-3gpp-ims-xml-body-handling

I will note John-Luc Bakker from RIM is an author of both the patent  
and  and the draft. The draft has been widely discussed at IETF with  
no mention of IPR before this. As an IESG member, I was not aware of  
this IPR at the time the approval was made and I do not believe any  
other IESG members were aware of it. I do believe the discussion would  
have been different had the IESG been aware of this IPR.

If anyone thinks this is, ah, inappropriate, I would recommend they  
appeal the IESG decision to approve this. (see section 6.5 of RFC 2026  
for how this works).  An IETF LC on this in the future would allow the  
community to make an decision that was informed of the IPR.

Cullen