Re: IETF privacy policy - still a bad idea

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Sat, 24 July 2010 10:54 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173223A69B2 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 03:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.943
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.943 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.944, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lSQZKIHROgDW for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 03:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from strange.aox.org (strange.aox.org [IPv6:2001:4d88:100c::1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5D93A69C2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 03:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (kalyani.aox.org [79.140.39.164]) by strange.aox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E49FA0038; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:55:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.1.3) with esmtpsa id 1279968905-41823-41822/8/1; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:55:05 +0200
Message-Id: <4C4AC745.1060701@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:58:13 +0200
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Organization: Me, http://arnt.gulbrandsen.priv.no
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100120 Shredder/3.0.2pre
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF privacy policy - still a bad idea
References: <C858915E.22949%stewe@stewe.org> <9885A682-95F5-4610-BC02-0F289EDDAA85@cdt.org> <p0624083cc864d72a22c9@[10.20.30.158]> <23A0C2B7-9EAC-4C84-8D4F-C18FB2590991@cdt.org> <20100721223355.1728.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20100721223355.1728.qmail@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 10:54:49 -0000

On 07/22/2010 12:33 AM, John Levine wrote:
> It would be helpful for someone, anyone, to explain in terms specific
> to the IETF what a privacy policy will accomplish.

Prevent cockups.

Too much time is spent discussing these issues over and over again. 
Remember that RFID experiment and how the IETF list blew up with privacy 
discussion?

I'd love to have a privacy policy done, so that next time the poor fools 
won't accidentally cause another of those threads. (God, it must suck to 
want to run an experiment and run into one of those threads.)

Arnt