IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Anonymous postings

SM <sm@resistor.net> Tue, 22 October 2013 00:33 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA07811E868C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aBn2Ic4HZzaB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5AD311E82E3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9M0XUNh001936; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1382402016; bh=8V73Q3l6omTyEggVhkEpFhu/ipTE0/sV4rW2bPKl1+g=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=kB6tZ2mlZ1l39/c6pQqp+HlpuS9uqHNcXvFhnMW/7K2tL/5Jko0XHzUo2Bol+wEEj 72ut7zP80tFOTcmacVmIeYk0I2IqSbu7XvKKnXZMa2Y65IC+DpwYeZYmNvhnOp4BH/ N5Te01rQmSH+uB6Hqfgm+Szu+2Rq/E3hiOCJLRlk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1382402016; i=@resistor.net; bh=8V73Q3l6omTyEggVhkEpFhu/ipTE0/sV4rW2bPKl1+g=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=F/ON8Kr/YZaPMeUgvZ4hjqJ90bahab+oXxPFwr9sRCuBOp/6yf5fB5bsEm0i7DDwn c3MwARwIcST+BDD9Dow9opkK1x+qDylvGJl2H/LW96WnvQDZ5ObYfKmq+AOD7JFito 3dIxDvFhXZtJovZT16ygKUcNE2huEKvEye1q49LY=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20131021170443.0e73d950@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:28:02 -0700
To: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: RE: Anonymous postings
In-Reply-To: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E3E25D8D@EXMB01CMS.surre y.ac.uk>
References: <5262FB95.8080500@gmail.com> <CAK41CSRKhD9W5WWm3xBJeb4U8Q6TbfG1EHnY_0BN7fC1QvO=iA@mail.gmail.com> <52657B0B.3080701@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20131021130523.0c4a6db8@resistor.net> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E3E25D8D@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:33:39 -0000

At 14:37 21-10-2013, l.wood@surrey.ac.uk wrote:
>A persistent identifier is helpful in sustained shared multiparty 
>conversation; whether it represents a "real" person or not does not matter.

Yes.

>And who are "we"?

I read the message [1] as personal opinion.

Regards,
-sm

1. msg-id: CAK41CSRKhD9W5WWm3xBJeb4U8Q6TbfG1EHnY_0BN7fC1QvO=iA@mail.gmail.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email