RE: Anonymous postings
<l.wood@surrey.ac.uk> Mon, 21 October 2013 21:43 UTC
Return-Path: <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C24011E85BA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.337, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SDLfsTfu+Vy3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com [195.245.231.153]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8284D11E8706 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [85.158.136.51:61803] by server-17.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id A6/5C-17059-4CF95625; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:42:28 +0000
X-Env-Sender: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-6.tower-49.messagelabs.com!1382391747!23256801!1
X-Originating-IP: [131.227.200.31]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.12; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 14305 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2013 21:42:28 -0000
Received: from exht011p.surrey.ac.uk (HELO EXHT011P.surrey.ac.uk) (131.227.200.31) by server-6.tower-49.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Oct 2013 21:42:28 -0000
Received: from EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk ([169.254.1.216]) by EXHT011P.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.200.31]) with mapi; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 22:42:27 +0100
From: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
To: sm@resistor.net, brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 22:37:51 +0100
Subject: RE: Anonymous postings
Thread-Topic: Anonymous postings
Thread-Index: Ac7Om2fqK5ZWZyPORKeEglAcbsIBmwACmNZy
Message-ID: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E3E25D8D@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <5262FB95.8080500@gmail.com> <CAK41CSRKhD9W5WWm3xBJeb4U8Q6TbfG1EHnY_0BN7fC1QvO=iA@mail.gmail.com> <52657B0B.3080701@gmail.com>, <6.2.5.6.2.20131021130523.0c4a6db8@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20131021130523.0c4a6db8@resistor.net>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:43:46 -0000
You say that, "Brian". You respond, "SM". A persistent identifier is helpful in sustained shared multiparty conversation; whether it represents a "real" person or not does not matter. And who are "we"? "L." ________________________________________ From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of SM [sm@resistor.net] Sent: 21 October 2013 21:18 To: Brian E Carpenter Cc: ietf@ietf.org Subject: Anonymous postings At 12:05 21-10-2013, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >1. We shouldn't tolerate anonymous postings in any case. There is a thread at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg05855.html and one at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg81133.html It is better to focus on the content instead of the messenger. Regards, -sm
- Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.ca… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Techno CAT
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Donald Eastlake
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Anonymous postings SM
- RE: Anonymous postings l.wood
- Re: Anonymous postings Melinda Shore
- Re: Anonymous postings Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Anonymous postings Melinda Shore
- RE: Anonymous postings SM
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Dave Crocker
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Barry Leiba
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Melinda Shore
- IETF::ISOC (was Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal… Dave Crocker
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… John C Klensin
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Scott Brim
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Ted Lemon
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with [censored] SM
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Jari Arkko
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Melinda Shore
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Melinda Shore
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Thomas Narten
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Ted Lemon
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Ted Lemon
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… John C Klensin
- RE: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… l.wood
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Christian Huitema
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… joel jaeggli
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Melinda Shore
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with [censored] SM
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with [censored] Jorge Amodio
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Scott Brim
- RE: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Richard Shockey
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Ted Lemon
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Randy Bush
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Dave Crocker
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Douglas Otis
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… ned+ietf
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… John Levine
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Jorge Amodio
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Jorge Amodio
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Melinda Shore
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… David Conrad
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Roger Jørgensen
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Jorge Amodio
- On anonymity.... (was: Sergeant at arms: please d… Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Douglas Otis
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Dan Harkins
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… TSG - personal
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techn… Ted Lemon