IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Possible BofF question -- I18n (was: Re: Possible OBF question -- I18n)

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Fri, 01 June 2018 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2185212DA21 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 11:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7sEapf8qMoxX for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 11:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a128.g.dreamhost.com (homie-sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8519812DA18 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 11:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a128.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a128.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB2830030408 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 11:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=S0rN45XqLbAcFS8ghFAj YUzPYo4=; b=rV6BvXETxrqnb0yZcmfvUlGR8+tkB8rPfXQfMVQs9sSNZugCtTOk 4WgNTF9NgG+sEnsvX9tERKBDSSDYi4mzDzxNDm8Ljjr+U6cbF7t5qZsKRKPCCerQ 4P82rMy0MMaz+0vY0YaCQJQATDZDG2c0Qbu091NNYPMOJbjrdGL+QVA=
Received: from mail-vk0-f42.google.com (mail-vk0-f42.google.com [209.85.213.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a128.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04ED430030403 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 11:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-f42.google.com with SMTP id e67-v6so16033732vke.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Jun 2018 11:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwd3Lgz1Xsdjm/OUdg/QE1UzQVtzCPaj3JeBFk76hEGSbRU6B4BO lgx0fCpkuDw6afp3W2OP538jUXpFN0/9a6HAMQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIbac/tTnITwaJzHM5Mbg6OytgVr0l/5XE0jwpIkOtedqlVKqxIeXwuxFtVAyUSwQ7xEd1oxzvH10JIpqGGNQ8=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:1551:: with SMTP id 78-v6mr6679288vkv.174.1527876133388; Fri, 01 Jun 2018 11:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180530231127.17198276FEE3@ary.qy> <071E6235FE7B088A2B56A238@PSB> <0093E2CD-670E-47B6-A286-4FDEB140FAD9@frobbit.se> <20180531172228.GF14446@localhost> <383c2404-7beb-63e9-b2b2-e75fd1b174f1@mozilla.com> <20180601041949.GH14446@localhost> <A13FFF23-49BD-459D-8B5B-D3448154EEBC@frobbit.se> <20180601151053.GI14446@localhost> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1806011249410.7694@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1806011249410.7694@ary.qy>
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 13:02:02 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAK3OfOjw3etj+=GG_p4KUFzN6dshcUN-Nj5T4O9y6Os+inr=qA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOjw3etj+=GG_p4KUFzN6dshcUN-Nj5T4O9y6Os+inr=qA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Possible BofF question -- I18n (was: Re: Possible OBF question -- I18n)
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003108d6056d986288"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/g-LmxYEoyNSvb5Ry1TfTGZ_lWpk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 18:02:17 -0000

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 11:50 AM John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018, Nico Williams wrote:
> > Doesn't seem like the end of the world to me.  Maybe there is no sense
> > of urgency to IDNA improvements.
>
> It's hard to understand how anyone who's familiar with the tangled
> progress of UTS#46 would say that.


Stop misreading.  "Maybe there is no sense of urgency" is clearly
speculation about the wider community's sense.  It's probably quite right
too.  If you think we should think it's urgent, then make the case.  Be
specific. What's broken, and why is fixing it urgent?

Nico
-- 

>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email