Re: Possible BofF question -- I18n (was: Re: Possible OBF question -- I18n)

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Fri, 01 June 2018 04:19 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E450D126DED for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2018 21:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cFNHBph9WPcK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2018 21:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a54.g.dreamhost.com (homie-sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 888DE126C0F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 May 2018 21:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a54.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a54.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B529A4800BB18; Thu, 31 May 2018 21:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=IyhtjtDnF4zXBB smoy2q7PfHmsg=; b=XhIAvy+NaiOhS0sgCFWsWwP+LsUwxuwkGAkcY/VRECwJo/ xX45mGMbVnNkGUDF6lZwl3XTp/IO1apYmG36+YMf51XMN1gT7DVgydWWZO9U7XiI d9zwuYwvLuFijnl1WCWixdkeOMiuc/73p2C5+z0KTBwFFMuFW/DxPN+6+QL5o=
Received: from localhost (cpe-70-123-158-140.austin.res.rr.com [70.123.158.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a54.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43AD74800BB16; Thu, 31 May 2018 21:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 23:19:50 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com>
Cc: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Possible BofF question -- I18n (was: Re: Possible OBF question -- I18n)
Message-ID: <20180601041949.GH14446@localhost>
References: <20180530231127.17198276FEE3@ary.qy> <071E6235FE7B088A2B56A238@PSB> <0093E2CD-670E-47B6-A286-4FDEB140FAD9@frobbit.se> <20180531172228.GF14446@localhost> <383c2404-7beb-63e9-b2b2-e75fd1b174f1@mozilla.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <383c2404-7beb-63e9-b2b2-e75fd1b174f1@mozilla.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/u9aJ5ZZmbjpoQmwLv8K9xC0e92Y>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 04:19:55 -0000

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:28:15AM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 5/31/18 11:22 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> > Lack of expertise is not a problem: we can develop it, 
> 
> We have not yet had success with developing expertise, or even
> competence. However, this is something we could discuss at the BoF.

Once I knew nothing about I18N.  Then I learned (plenty).  I'm not
saying I'm more expert than anyone else here, but I am saying that I
learned.

Can everyone else not??  What lack of faith you are all displaying!

I mean, here's how you do this:

a) you get a couple of ADs with I18N experience,
b) also someone on the IAB with I18N experience,
c) add a mandate for an I18N Considerations section,
d) add an I18N directorate.

Does that not sound familiar?

I mean, this "we lack expertise in field X" thing is remarkably silly.
I bet not that long ago that was said about security...

I'm sure we're still not great, collectively, on security, but we don't
just give up on security.  We didn't, and we won't.

Is anyone here saying I18N is more difficult than security?  Seriously?
Do you think that people who can build complex Internet protocols cannot
figure out I18N even passably well enough?

What areas does the IETF have expertise in?  Please list them.  I bet
none are much simpler than I18N.  The Internet has become critical to
the world's economy and we are responsible for not ****ing that up, but
we can't handle I18N?!

No, please buck up, get a spine transplant, set down some rules, and
watch participants figure it out.  It may not turn out to be fantastic,
but it will mostly get the job done well enough.

Dumbfoundedly yours,

Nico

PS: Really, I'm shocked at this thread.  I don't get it.  What series of
    events is causing the sad, utter despair on display here?  I've not
    been following the IETF all that much, so it's possible I missed
    some disasters.  Can they have been so bad?  Please fill me in on
    them.

    The abdication mood here is depressing.