IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Possible BofF question -- I18n (was: Re: Possible OBF question -- I18n)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Fri, 01 June 2018 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6AE512D95D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 08:59:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Gyy1Dw0Xy-B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 08:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu [18.9.25.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0868D12D945 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 08:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 1209190c-327ff70000002de1-4d-5b116d6edd54
Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id EE.C7.11745.E6D611B5; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 11:59:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id w51FxgkX018477; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 11:59:42 -0400
Received: from kduck.kaduk.org (24-107-191-124.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com [24.107.191.124]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id w51FxbT7018699 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 1 Jun 2018 11:59:40 -0400
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 10:59:37 -0500
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Possible BofF question -- I18n (was: Re: Possible OBF question -- I18n)
Message-ID: <20180601155937.GN27985@kduck.kaduk.org>
References: <20180530231127.17198276FEE3@ary.qy> <071E6235FE7B088A2B56A238@PSB> <0093E2CD-670E-47B6-A286-4FDEB140FAD9@frobbit.se> <20180531172228.GF14446@localhost> <383c2404-7beb-63e9-b2b2-e75fd1b174f1@mozilla.com> <20180601041949.GH14446@localhost> <A13FFF23-49BD-459D-8B5B-D3448154EEBC@frobbit.se> <20180601151053.GI14446@localhost> <D49D88F0-3159-4913-BF95-755B88B70B2D@frobbit.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="da4uJneut+ArUgXk"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D49D88F0-3159-4913-BF95-755B88B70B2D@frobbit.se>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrCKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixG6nopufKxht8FLb4tnG+SwW6zbtY3Zg 8ng7aTOTx5IlP5kCmKK4bFJSczLLUov07RK4MhZ92c5eMJ+/Yu6aiUwNjK28XYycHBICJhI9 j24xdTFycQgJLGaS2DD7HwuEs4FRYvfRf6wQzhUmiZmt/1lAWlgEVCS6Tj1hBLHZgOyG7svM ILaIgKXEj5ZHYDXMAoISk/9+BqsRFgiT6Lz6FWgFBwcv0Lq9fzNAwkICE5kl1s+2BLF5gcpP znwC1Vom0fF5DitIObOAtMTyfxwgYU4BO4kT09eCbRIVUJbY23eIfQKjwCwk3bOQdM9C6IYI 60js3HqHDUNYW2LZwtfMELatxLp171kWMLKvYpRNya3SzU3MzClOTdYtTk7My0st0jXUy80s 0UtNKd3ECIoATkmeHYxn3ngdYhTgYFTi4Q1wFowWYk0sK67MPcQoycGkJMr7zAIoxJeUn1KZ kVicEV9UmpNafIhRBWjXow2rLzBKseTl56UqifCGewLV8aYkVlalFuXDlElzsCiJ82YvYowW EkhPLEnNTk0tSC2CycpwcChJ8H7IAWoULEpNT61Iy8wpQUgzcXAeYpTg4AEa7gtSw1tckJhb nJkOkT/FqCglzqsAkhAASWSU5sH1ghKXRPb+mleM4kBvCfMeyQaq4gEmPbjuV0CDmYAGv5YV ABlckoiQkmpgdHnCMTX29UyFnCktKes0HGcmVjkJWLzp3M0Yq28iw7CqNyNYWmcn46xJ/yYZ C8z2eu4xcdHWk5uN74Ypbv+/Q/Q1m4C+533+Y8cOvtm0ccbR6/cjPSccLnrAJjdP4Imj9cYX pje/+zf+NOKVXFC9o9JP/ca3SU3yQaxGd5UNPX2UbswLE36aqsRSnJFoqMVcVJwIAOT3vbI3 AwAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/qcYrNL4y2AgaYwYSbt51u5lrJ8k>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 15:59:46 -0000

On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 05:13:53PM +0200, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> On 1 Jun 2018, at 17:10, Nico Williams wrote:
> 
> > Doesn't seem like the end of the world to me.  Maybe there is no sense of urgency to IDNA improvements.
> >
> > Require that documents have I18N Considerations sections, require review by an I18N directorate, and you'll see how quickly participants who used to not give a damn about I18 will come around, learn what they have to, and get their I18N work done.  Suddenly the I18N directorate will be in demand.
> 
> Exactly this was what happened, which made IDNA2008 updates at

Er, exactly what is what happened?
I don't remember many drafts going by the IESG with I18N
Considerations sections...

-Ben

> IANA be blocked. IAB have now asked me as  the appointed expert to
> move things again, which I will do now actually(!) and we'll see
> how many will show up this time. Last time exactly three people.
> Out of which I was one.
> 
>    Patrik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email