IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Possible BofF question -- I18n

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Fri, 01 June 2018 03:33 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF20B124D6C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2018 20:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xZR2iOwZaSO6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2018 20:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EF42126C25 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 May 2018 20:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w513XXUb071180 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 31 May 2018 22:33:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
Subject: Re: Possible BofF question -- I18n
To: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <20180530231127.17198276FEE3@ary.qy> <071E6235FE7B088A2B56A238@PSB> <0093E2CD-670E-47B6-A286-4FDEB140FAD9@frobbit.se> <15D103030DE952C9507BA134@PSB> <CAF4+nEHFrVGBPtdKA8KMoUZqX07ftOcn7mMYPT67rVXzLqfXEQ@mail.gmail.com> <8EF27A44-5642-44AE-ABAB-8D424B3257FB@frobbit.se>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <48337599-66b3-c388-cbdb-db7c992e7dc0@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 22:33:27 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8EF27A44-5642-44AE-ABAB-8D424B3257FB@frobbit.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yZxgjbQdSwTltRZpLnStLH1rYzQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 03:33:46 -0000

On 5/31/18 2:33 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> On 31 May 2018, at 20:04, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>
>> I disagree. I was co-chair of the joint IETF/W3C XMLDSIG WG which I believe was reasonably successful.
> Yes but...
>
> It worked when/because of/thanks to good synchronisation on who did what work and who had the lead etc. And the work was done when we where in a different time...

If you need something more time-local, WebRTC/RTCWEB was likewise a 
joint W3C/IETF effort. As in your description, though, it seems that a 
good understanding of scoping and responsibilities between the groups 
was a key to success.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email