IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Possible BofF question -- I18n (was: Re: Possible OBF question -- I18n)

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Thu, 31 May 2018 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05D312D879 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2018 11:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CNLSLp5_z-5Z for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2018 11:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x234.google.com (mail-it0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB60012FAA5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 May 2018 11:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x234.google.com with SMTP id q72-v6so29151622itc.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 May 2018 11:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xZomlO2ASx8m3N7HtJr+aQfv+0AOPZkaTSRa4jZM1+0=; b=cC2ifPAIOkKd5HlYbWsHf8j324pfSXt9xdoFbarW821zJRhEFR/Z3rCNI5INYub2bN bkC9z/WyU3KehUQBWyQeK/qdpbdCYNrhOHQCqN7ufolPe0CfsHZyhFoE/upHI4eHzQtd AHWqRkheBNL8z1oWbQasCbkOcmzE7bWGl4O/5CHRk8OF+ylYvWbiCfewBvQCtOLvwvZB bMyNPKWBcxYmKPA+/ypBaU4zR7t3sbRkbdCPA2758yEb+SygI3COhpiLZi+aRfieDVA9 dT68/hNrBpfRqOV45i5E9yA95vyqKZhxomw++hZ91OGcdK7L0rXdG4LNlI7K3Wau3bsN f+Qg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xZomlO2ASx8m3N7HtJr+aQfv+0AOPZkaTSRa4jZM1+0=; b=V17E9Mbu7+4AWyGuJvWDEbXsX+G0MGZsP6M3VxThQJf0gWw1A0daucEWiXu30vcfpU 7GcSrUt5EhxOd1GqSye4qrFz3DEEVW8cACk5tCVojw0Ji1qbwCOqlhuyOd45ShPj5nIN yGsGZBi7YiCmHkivCLPks/nYc6e3nkh17Qfa8hWH4k6pJhfs30JhYDwzSffBagSqzAjm Sl6+bg3BvEvsOTHCzbW8gCDnCJi+D4JspPQV2FZyz/+ckxcXbg4YuVSPP1IVwuFBsZWx aorSxW7vEBmHIokq1UPoAP4Dv1CByq7RyYqpxp9RQb239ISjX1PHtml8jCE3oXWhZLG5 VNsQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3TGNC+UUk5OVeUBVYZdi2VxVp/rdduoXGF2UI3+ir8yO/FT+5q wYuDnZdq3KTA+MXtMo/EmxwzF9aAJehFQqn+9uA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJNhg4xVfqRJw1cRkSI+b/0TL+6nv4eat3RQI6UkmH2C0s1aaxSx34/Wj28GoeKo3MUigci7qkoB+9ky5XESBQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:1994:: with SMTP id b142-v6mr1068689itb.14.1527789906938; Thu, 31 May 2018 11:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a6b:a210:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 31 May 2018 11:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <15D103030DE952C9507BA134@PSB>
References: <20180530231127.17198276FEE3@ary.qy> <071E6235FE7B088A2B56A238@PSB> <0093E2CD-670E-47B6-A286-4FDEB140FAD9@frobbit.se> <15D103030DE952C9507BA134@PSB>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 14:04:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEHFrVGBPtdKA8KMoUZqX07ftOcn7mMYPT67rVXzLqfXEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Possible BofF question -- I18n (was: Re: Possible OBF question -- I18n)
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/k6KH55d8o_Fn0i37EiRfhGXWW6s>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 18:05:12 -0000

Hi,

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:51 AM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> I could see a "joint development" collaboration between the IETF
> and some other SDO(s) working together and cross-checking each
> other's work --not merely cross-area, but cross-SDO-- but that
> IETF has never been able to pull one of those off before and,
> AFAIK, has never expressed much interest in doing so.  Even if

I disagree. I was co-chair of the joint IETF/W3C XMLDSIG WG which I
believe was reasonably successful.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

> we went that route, we might need a different review mechanism
> than throwing a spec into the air with an IETF LC and seeing
> what came down.
>
>     john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email