Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repeated ?
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 25 March 2024 22:53 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2206DC18DB99 for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:53:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.085
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.085 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b="gyOLgFIW"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="Nu33zJIN"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tHbyWwpP-ERb for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2CCAC18DB89 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3EF320034E; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:53:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:53:10 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1711407190; x=1711493590; bh=meeE0QNGFr0Y38KtsKBakD414YJC6yCSiaacCmaZE0c=; b= gyOLgFIWlohMQGCdUeW8YaoeEWRNutusOIPZ3qmYcpnRlOYh+pbNxI8XKoF03oki hYG9fzhrY1AmhtOb5GSWB+WJQR1y6KjDFZb0X0e02qeOyAzeKyyj9g1HBSMDPbJR WCuBHTuxlEG1VQQd1eFAzBk/fy2gEm57qEvE2rRGAodbb06L7eCP1vSC05wCwnVL eswIeoB3OKbzZD+t57DYp0wptY5JDqRf0EOTkdz/qvTEF7hMN65rMX86T3SVxfgy Di8u5X1b5Q6d/VQvycxkmiZmmHUDtwRIT06GUCAF0XUcOvJvExRM3iLwqim626dE ob/fR0klCsG0+uvF1Doc4w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1711407190; x= 1711493590; bh=meeE0QNGFr0Y38KtsKBakD414YJC6yCSiaacCmaZE0c=; b=N u33zJIN7Rg0mkif9jv96FooZBCralNmKuFm3duaxS4JDyFNMkL+oqk4vP/LrS17X MRAWsNMaQKCuJIuquf4wn92YPQApKoHosjjh0mBrukym9fR5XQfm5Clt/owafTQ1 gCIX+nXqdgLxkl95DtsoKcDIWBVh71WYIpJY5jdSRACpbfZTnKqKcTVHP/xzZnar QQzMNxnTQF/Nq1WITT2yPyX2KvENlwhrqa3hOwo2+12ISMaMAyWqmfHUfvDuFPuQ s8WzCO4LPNNkFZBrsQSECrGJiYcyzgjI10C8r8vv/1e/LCakimCH2kWwjWW2JvvT tCoK6V66PzCtJO7vtfOPQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:VQACZid-Mx7394fxhYvQK6Y3AAWSvXtiYK1GufnCRDhF-x2mmabBGQ> <xme:VQACZsPcLYW5kRpY4gr4eOvFjBcpBebyTcOxtrBBjItMp7tJ_EkYE0iDwR0EfOemV j0ON-UNip-AjOyt9w>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:VQACZjiJAn5pKwQBuiobUqFojwoB7Dm7Ym060R_3SQevdstTTXHH38sBbawNAQ0SWxKxbcTQh7Sj53kGbvQJYsSGrPIi7CwNPGL26E4qeWx34JA0NvdroaeO>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrudduvddgtdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpegtggfuhfgjffevgffkfhfvofesth hqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhkucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothes mhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeegleegkedtgeeufeefvefhvdfgff fhheelhefgtddtvddvjeegvdefjeetvdduleenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhg pdhmnhhothdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:VQACZv8o4EKympPLCMlISmKQ1oRihdt0vqfnArIBwPDyrL1db55pVQ> <xmx:VQACZutSngeKI6qxVPaYN6yF_t4h1u01Sij-_3jr-arll5T2MR9xFA> <xmx:VQACZmEMczjR0GjqVm7cMCANRG5ckcbXZ2xZSUVmY43rTME8WkbJ7Q> <xmx:VQACZtP8JGCd9FftWN4bgd4z1jBfyFJS4TnN0ce9qWMcKjFFFnHWfA> <xmx:VgACZiI9Mqo0pG5MnjJ3LQU8_S14padSihdvl6PU9D9hQskFSJRO3A>
Feedback-ID: ie6694242:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:53:08 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <ZgH3H4CNcUKjw0g4@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:53:03 +1100
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <55E67BE7-8815-4E31-87F9-F72B76D87F35@mnot.net>
References: <ZgCdcWGzgESGxj8v@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <383149.1711340175@dyas> <ZgH3H4CNcUKjw0g4@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/4GUv1UAjbw6afXI4IP4DVf3960Y>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repeated ?
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IETF meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 22:53:45 -0000
Maybe it's "people who have been coming to the IETF from Australia have been subjected to the travel pain you just noticed for the last twenty years; let's spread it out a tiny, tiny amount." > On 26 Mar 2024, at 09:13, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: > > The asians i asked in general liked it because of much lower TZ differences. > But also observed lower attendance and hence potentially lower productivity of course. > > I was primarily wondering if there was a formula like "we needed X more 'locals' > to show up than outside of australia, that's our criteria for success". > > Cheers > Toerless > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 02:16:15PM +1000, Michael Richardson wrote: >> >> Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: >>> Sorry if subject question was asked and answered elswhere/earlier, please >>> provide pointers to summary thereof. If not: >> >>> Who will atually determine if Brisbane was a success to be repeted, and if so how ? >> >> LLC+IESG. >> >>> Btw: I very much enjoyed Brisbane, but i was privileged in having to fly in only >>> from a location (SFO) that had a direct connection of <= 14 hours, whereas colleagues >>> from further east in the Americas and of course in Europe did report total travel >>> times even in excess of 30 hours. And i also managed to attach vacations to make >>> the travel very much worthwhile. And i do collaborate a lot with folks from east asia, >>> who of course also had a good presence. >> >> I travelled for 38 hours. >> That included some dumb layovers in Toronto and a really long in Vancouver, >> probably as a result of the Dreamliner incident that Air NZ had two weeks >> ago. >> The flight from Toronto to Vancouver was actually the least pleasant of the >> three. >> >>> That's especially why i would like to understand best how much effort the IETF puts into >>> deciding for this type of locations and especially how it will justify it to those for >>> whom it was inacceptable due to these travel issues. >> >> Endless discussion. >> >> I think that the right people to ask are the asians. >> Was the trip from Tokyo or Nanjing or India significant more pleasant for you >> than when we for instance, meet in Prague or Philadelpha/Montreal? >> >> Clearly, it is unpleasant for Europeans and east-coastians to get to >> Australia (or Bangkok). But, it's also unpleasant for Australians to get to >> Montreal. >> >> -- >> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works >> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS* > > > > -- > --- > tte@cs.fau.de > > _______________________________________________ > Mtgvenue mailing list > Mtgvenue@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… John Levine
- [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repeated ? Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Dirk Kutscher
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… George Michaelson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Dirk Kutscher
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… George Michaelson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Jay Daley
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Jay Daley
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repea… John Levine