IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repeated ?

Dirk Kutscher <ietf@dkutscher.net> Tue, 26 March 2024 01:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@dkutscher.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFA0C14F69D for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dkutscher.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r2GhoHJeDJit for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [217.72.192.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AED3C14F5EB for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 18:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dkutscher.net; s=s1-ionos; t=1711417560; x=1712022360; i=ietf@dkutscher.net; bh=KAjmmBhVnuxDcgJBJsHHz65V/FfhnrdWIF9toj7mJMo=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To: References; b=qzgNJZXu3//5gNlccukkYLc2TCoxlGISRQxVYU3Lo/UJ9KMT6G1piiOP0HU1W91q BrJ2+jdYLxEADm/LbYhshhN2bBkAyQcBD0Y40SChPkr+6Efu7UBk4Q6HGoJ7a/qi2 QfWVEcxcYkkO10TWYJKF/ylgWfgtiwQanjVqA+5CsBTndKjEH0AuCZt5ckyqFUq5u +R9x54YON/M9ELFyZF7aAc4lB+46hfMaoVFkWNYh1ELluxBUE0AJCKwH5ovDix3Nj ogCdwX/x+mduvc8HsqjAAxXnA4A3kHK6OXB8FQbJFURF0lON3OtMGabSr2hdxEusE Zhga6JnzXrMw8Q5LJA==
X-UI-Sender-Class: 55c96926-9e95-11ee-ae09-1f7a4046a0f6
Received: from [139.13.114.101] ([139.13.114.101]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue109 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MwQKp-1shJac2kPF-00sK2X; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 02:46:00 +0100
From: Dirk Kutscher <ietf@dkutscher.net>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:45:54 +0800
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5937)
Message-ID: <2E1FD6C8-3940-4CEA-B0BB-5AAAE6A56F59@dkutscher.net>
In-Reply-To: <383149.1711340175@dyas>
References: <ZgCdcWGzgESGxj8v@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <383149.1711340175@dyas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_FD0099B3-9F7B-400A-A6CC-34DD0F64374C_="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:AeVSqe87H3UW8saXYdsnNvXbQiDVSivxc8Wbgr4cZeLxKjdXEmS OAHUmsWZ6ZZomZLiitQ371WL8RLCDzC8UYkOrbXrYRCYVDbB5sA0IyP4tOO5RZ3yvJ9ou91 QO8GvC4dLp1HQlJBzMsKgFsB8VwdGoMSfZgcIIBd77aslxG35DnrG4Fx08h6P5eVrCd1afM m3AI1EA/t0LeKkvS2Yonw==
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:oYRodtf+jcM=;fhEWjdOT2eRCCW/4Exa6c+LrXyn CqJSOJo4NxiZZxxFxxcOFlbP3EBY0qs0BjQlhldLe17GLyv5nK775nS7CBepmKhumJP8YSvbw S9RiFkaoYQfrabg/8figLhUl/BPiIyQwJbzbP/AwkhUb89ZEmEUDyIVttIu+mwifD6SqP/Tyr Qhiwp6VziQj9bVg0Uw77HtZ1HJJV2gLbTqNedo1Vu7OWb2jYRFC6wQJkWWTCxx7CKEN/u7Lli TZTiqr4ptglGm7jfUYvsOXBvGUTRB5Tm+LSK++JAoeersylKcvSegSBoiSDKpWwXO3fgakKhK i04q8AMpJxg0lxo6miqe/iZmHf17oDqpUNafm7MWajGz2bQulf2OthFctVkj0s3fviAwBkCBt cScX5jYRPSu1iRvcBhXP87YOqaITD/yheuuQGK1/YzSF2BuQ6BhTOH8Xc+h7LXzAdRNFs/Tad jf/TWZZBF0xYzXEgjAQaWU7M9uCQnSNVWnIjY/7xnObGEVBU7kFwDG3EDhGLYkmGMMW12ZUzB 5YLiRUWRzqYxmImmGXS8mLbL9zCxM442D14XMIE3IaLlnDREaqCedSpoNjNdXfUXveXJRvKfO 6g28uGSR7EEl0M28z1RbuT79jgrc+nf2/P5zPpBGpfduJTSwt0oSISU0ExCwZgWATw3YHSlmT 5Xbkt9PkwZo2PmOtR/1JR7xZvDAaOxOz81+GSFn3lleGiL9Ta+ryDnOWDZvDLsGX0uaYnjREq iFJNeDYFZT6CbClalCZ+94s7KR2msea+Cld5pqf8uLMTCfywGCOaDg=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/SOYsocZMBm8mtzgg4OLxQKUAJA8>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repeated ?
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IETF meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 01:46:13 -0000

> I think that the right people to ask are the asians.
> Was the trip from Tokyo or Nanjing or India significant more pleasant for you
> than when we for instance, meet in Prague or Philadelpha/Montreal?

Yep, Brisbane was a direct 8 hours flight from Hong Kong that felt like a short flight compared to all the other trips to Europe and North America.

Some had to transfer in Sydney, I heard.

Personally, I found it a great place for a meeting and would definitely not mind coming back at some point.

Best regards,
Dirk

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email