IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repeated ?

Dirk Kutscher <ietf@dkutscher.net> Tue, 26 March 2024 09:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@dkutscher.net>
X-Original-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3F4C14F68B for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 02:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dkutscher.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P7Za-lWUzKEX for <mtgvenue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 02:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70F3AC14F694 for <mtgvenue@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 02:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dkutscher.net; s=s1-ionos; t=1711444917; x=1712049717; i=ietf@dkutscher.net; bh=80sM1wjqm7WU5Ih6RguQY2RH9ukEuv01Ommi31QXTdE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To: References; b=WAdS5qH0bTcg1RgddaMQEOIwFXmuouRE20pRylZqHYzde5fxrNx+rIzCW2cpxSp9 DI0wQJU+XCpgOfjccKWKTR26ZFTJmdYTn1ztcEuw5mG8NybY2QfAwQYP2TJhDzSkR TjCVyI1JmNMLPikb2upA0lgm+6HgYfWpdkQVwq7XBMnXbXwSePNRhxZrWJ5/YP6d3 nAi0MnGLIu5RjJoNAchSCJ27B2P66jJkzjQ43cMeR7/jZMli5eYQOoNGnx2zUEF2X zhMRIV1S61rfEyW4/F/Z+P9HRTlaOWTuFZfZvs0lXZoMUtoBax1u9kK8bLG4wr1Z8 dPX6McTYPGOiZkFf9Q==
X-UI-Sender-Class: 55c96926-9e95-11ee-ae09-1f7a4046a0f6
Received: from [10.13.1.81] ([14.198.181.183]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue012 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N3Gok-1so3ZW2Zgw-010Mg1; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:21:57 +0100
From: Dirk Kutscher <ietf@dkutscher.net>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, mtgvenue@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 17:21:52 +0800
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.14r5937)
Message-ID: <78459718-A840-405D-B71C-B57AD2551B8E@dkutscher.net>
In-Reply-To: <ZgIu9_zNkgLukU6I@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <ZgCdcWGzgESGxj8v@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <383149.1711340175@dyas> <2E1FD6C8-3940-4CEA-B0BB-5AAAE6A56F59@dkutscher.net> <ZgIu9_zNkgLukU6I@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_90BD3E06-9D6D-463C-8DEA-C646A2B23F60_="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:uFakxkvYpgskBwmVMuQd4HDnF0P/s5o1ZAeWg4AxKDx6XPcqLUU LugwjwQfgOTGvHv3PwYG44Wx87iUy3gdySPSMvrVGivRKe6rH/TcOvT7YFhJGbOhKhsSkfW nJZdzktpXfVZWwsDcB/30lSay0fTeAjkUJmOggZJKD92Y/pjzaOUfcA94X/XA5vyUF7MO2X pTCJYw9NIuGPsez0glbbw==
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:9OiKrp5DvdU=;Xf9wUyu+NBIFZvep/BFTWASlZET SwXc8LRjO16y8b9Zr0CXUh44Uts7KrV3Whm+DQlQ/Jg8J95UzRFJ+Q5kQ9j5qn+4UaksU4xxo wR4jm0d75u7X8afDSP7Yo7RX7ydCwGU9AgWeo+7ao01GyAOaKQrrvyECx56nbyDV/9e4dprxl TrhcF7t7PXRSCTI/wLjlHSaiw8i+PYJW79BImALhgboHOIe7aZbQiv6NLrQ6s9LKI2V09NjME /4e1XSQyDHFp9OlhtiRiez3muF7CmXzUkzZvrFYee4byAxxggkkYOpmiq4JVWMDF/i/yHMLcj MH1YU8Vh/1NQI4t+czHv74wHwg/D+e7vq03F+jyemKCDxcaR40wayIPKM2luIemmt9eNQBur6 R6AGLitowxp9JB/fZNhAq5Gc34AHl2SmYjviv+zETetn7H4bb1ci239cf2mEL6XNiuYctf+HO XgsqjZfI/n7LQqtTYGSNM3halMBX6aUapIKNyOHF+yBi7cfzUYKzE0ScuyGDPNv92HQehJfef 7Dc6L47LtCCptx4vrJc/XOxKMcRlMG7JyeErvlH1PEykROkhzjgiPL20qZZP3/p57k9DoKQgX VXVUWaE8XM2juEp261RDDo+9HkQnwQQMMSxBN266uRxVwmp+UZdNIMZ7wrQJrABVW4ev3PawO ISZTId6jPJ76pkv19PkXoIZ8G7blsXwGW2PJbPO5NsXn4X7UlhGUz1VYB+WmI41kUM+1Oro4k rK2J81S4Fego+GSGerv5JXuTawDdPiPFFIbiLhGYhMLtjwn3BcZhzw=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mtgvenue/Ry9KUqkWDYvr7JMMOdFFuGbIj08>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Was Brisbane a success to be repeated ?
X-BeenThere: mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for email discussion of the IETF meeting venue selection process." <mtgvenue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mtgvenue/>
List-Post: <mailto:mtgvenue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue>, <mailto:mtgvenue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:22:09 -0000

> But did it work out equally productive to you wrt to people you wanted to meet with in person ?

I had a really productive week, so, yes, I think. Of course, some colleagues from Europe and the US were dearly missed, and too many groups didn't even meet. Our hybrid meeting tech is useful for the actual group meetings – but we all know the value of hallway discussions...

My conclusion: Folks from the asian-pacific part of the world (especially OZ and NZ) get to enjoy crazy long flights for our meetings all the time, so it seems fair to have a meeting there once in a while. From a meeting and personal experience perspective, it was a great venue. I would really like to come back.

Dirk

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email